Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Haskell

1.4K
1.2K
+ 1
527
Racket

89
83
+ 1
54
Add tool

Haskell vs Racket: What are the differences?

  1. Type System: Haskell is a statically typed language with a strong, static type system, while Racket is dynamically typed where the type of a variable is determined during runtime. This difference can affect the safety and predictability of the code.
  2. Syntax: Haskell uses indentation to define code blocks, whereas Racket relies on parentheses and prefix notation. This variance in syntax can impact readability and ease of writing code.
  3. Functional vs. Multi-Paradigm: Haskell is primarily a functional programming language, emphasizing immutability and pure functions, while Racket is a multi-paradigm language that supports imperative, functional, and object-oriented programming styles. This distinction influences the design patterns and approaches used in each language.
  4. Tooling and Ecosystem: Haskell has a robust ecosystem with tools like GHC for compiling and Cabal for package management, while Racket has its own IDE, DrRacket, and package manager, making development and maintenance processes different for each language.
  5. Community and Support: The Haskell community tends to focus on functional programming concepts and research, while the Racket community is known for its emphasis on education, language design, and practical applications. This disparity can affect the availability of resources, libraries, and support for developers in each language.

In Summary, Haskell and Racket differ in their type systems, syntax, programming paradigms, tooling, ecosystem, and community focus.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Haskell
Pros of Racket
  • 90
    Purely-functional programming
  • 66
    Statically typed
  • 59
    Type-safe
  • 39
    Open source
  • 38
    Great community
  • 31
    Built-in concurrency
  • 30
    Built-in parallelism
  • 30
    Composable
  • 24
    Referentially transparent
  • 20
    Generics
  • 15
    Type inference
  • 15
    Intellectual satisfaction
  • 12
    If it compiles, it's correct
  • 8
    Flexible
  • 8
    Monads
  • 5
    Great type system
  • 4
    Proposition testing with QuickCheck
  • 4
    One of the most powerful languages *(see blub paradox)*
  • 4
    Purely-functional Programming
  • 3
    Highly expressive, type-safe, fast development time
  • 3
    Pattern matching and completeness checking
  • 3
    Great maintainability of the code
  • 3
    Fun
  • 3
    Reliable
  • 2
    Best in class thinking tool
  • 2
    Kind system
  • 2
    Better type-safe than sorry
  • 2
    Type classes
  • 1
    Predictable
  • 1
    Orthogonality
  • 4
    Meta-programming
  • 3
    Hygienic macros
  • 2
    FFI
  • 2
    Great libraries
  • 2
    Beautiful code
  • 2
    Rapid development
  • 2
    Fast
  • 2
    Gradual typing
  • 2
    Nanopass compiler
  • 2
    Extensible
  • 2
    Racket Macro system
  • 2
    Cross platform GUI
  • 2
    Module system
  • 2
    Macro Stepper
  • 2
    Beginner friendly
  • 2
    Built-in concurrency
  • 2
    Built-in parallelism
  • 2
    Functional Programming
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Language-oriented programming
  • 2
    Pattern matching
  • 1
    Easy syntax
  • 1
    Type inference
  • 1
    Static type-checker
  • 1
    Racketscript
  • 1
    Great community
  • 1
    IDE
  • 1
    Typed Racket
  • 1
    Good documentation
  • 1
    Efficient compiler

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Haskell
Cons of Racket
  • 9
    Too much distraction in language extensions
  • 8
    Error messages can be very confusing
  • 5
    Libraries have poor documentation
  • 3
    No good ABI
  • 3
    No best practices
  • 2
    Poor packaging for apps written in it for Linux distros
  • 2
    Sometimes performance is unpredictable
  • 1
    Slow compilation
  • 1
    Monads are hard to understand
  • 2
    LISP BASED
  • 2
    No GitHub

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Haskell?

It is a general purpose language that can be used in any domain and use case, it is ideally suited for proprietary business logic and data analysis, fast prototyping and enhancing existing software environments with correct code, performance and scalability.

What is Racket?

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Haskell?
What companies use Racket?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Haskell?
What tools integrate with Racket?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Haskell and Racket?
Scala
Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.
Clojure
Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.
Erlang
Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.
Rust
Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.
Python
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
See all alternatives