Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
HBase vs Memcached: What are the differences?
Introduction: HBase and Memcached are both popular data storage solutions used in modern web applications. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features that make them suitable for specific use cases.
Data Model: HBase is a distributed, column-oriented database that stores data in a tabular format with rows and columns, similar to a traditional RDBMS. On the other hand, Memcached is an in-memory key-value store that caches data in memory for fast retrieval.
Consistency: HBase offers strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that data is always up-to-date and correct. In contrast, Memcached sacrifices consistency for performance by allowing eventual consistency, which means data may not always be immediately consistent across all nodes in a distributed system.
Persistence: HBase stores data persistently on disk, providing durability and fault-tolerance in case of node failures. Memcached, being an in-memory store, does not have built-in persistence mechanisms and relies on external solutions for data durability.
Scalability: HBase is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increasing data volumes and traffic. Memcached, while also horizontally scalable, may require additional capacity planning to ensure performance as the dataset grows.
Query Language: HBase supports querying data using Apache Hadoop's ecosystem tools like Apache Hive and Apache Pig, making it suitable for complex analytical queries. In contrast, Memcached does not have built-in query capabilities and is primarily used for simple key-value lookups.
Use Cases: HBase is commonly used for applications requiring real-time data processing, analytics, and strong consistency guarantees. Memcached, on the other hand, is often employed for caching frequently accessed data or temporary storage to improve application performance.
In Summary, HBase and Memcached differ in terms of data model, consistency, persistence, scalability, query language support, and use cases.
I am researching different querying solutions to handle ~1 trillion records of data (in the realm of a petabyte). The data is mostly textual. I have identified a few options: Milvus, HBase, RocksDB, and Elasticsearch. I was wondering if there is a good way to compare the performance of these options (or if anyone has already done something like this). I want to be able to compare the speed of ingesting and querying textual data from these tools. Does anyone have information on this or know where I can find some? Thanks in advance!
You've probably come to a decision already but for those reading...here are some resources we put together to help people learn more about Milvus and other databases https://zilliz.com/comparison and https://github.com/zilliztech/VectorDBBench. I don't think they include RocksDB or HBase yet (you could could recommend on GitHub) but hopefully they help answer your Elastic Search questions.
Pros of HBase
- Performance9
- OLTP5
- Fast Point Queries1
Pros of Memcached
- Fast object cache139
- High-performance129
- Stable91
- Mature65
- Distributed caching system33
- Improved response time and throughput11
- Great for caching HTML3
- Putta2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of HBase
Cons of Memcached
- Only caches simple types2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is HBase?
What is Memcached?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use HBase?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with HBase?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+5
+4
+4
+6
+17
+9+17