Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Headless UI vs Material-UI: What are the differences?
Headless UI and Material-UI are two popular UI libraries used for building user interfaces in web applications. While they have some similarities, they also have key differences that make them distinct from each other.
Component Styles: One key difference between Headless UI and Material-UI is how they handle component styles. Headless UI provides a set of minimalistic and unstyled components that developers can customize according to their own design needs. On the other hand, Material-UI comes with its own pre-designed and styled components following the Material Design guidelines. This allows developers to quickly create visually appealing interfaces without much customization effort.
Design Language: Headless UI does not enforce a specific design language or style. It provides a more flexible and customizable approach where developers can define their own design system or integrate with other existing design systems. In contrast, Material-UI strictly adheres to the Material Design language, providing a consistent user experience across different platforms and applications.
Component Ecosystem: Material-UI has a more extensive component ecosystem compared to Headless UI. It offers a wide range of ready-to-use components such as buttons, inputs, and modals, making it easier for developers to build complex UIs quickly. Headless UI, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a foundation of basic building blocks that developers can use to build their own custom components and UI patterns.
Accessibility: Material-UI places a strong emphasis on accessibility, ensuring that its components are usable by all users, including those with disabilities. It provides built-in accessibility features and follows best practices to make the UI accessible. While Headless UI also supports accessibility, it does not have the same level of built-in accessibility features as Material-UI.
Developer Experience: Headless UI offers a more developer-centric experience, providing a set of utility functions and hooks that can be used to customize and control the behavior of the components. It empowers developers to have more control over the UI logic and allows for advanced UI customization. Material-UI, on the other hand, focuses more on abstracting away the implementation details and providing a simpler and more intuitive API for developers to work with.
Community and Support: Material-UI has a larger and more active community compared to Headless UI. It has a vast amount of online resources, documentation, and community forums where developers can ask questions, share knowledge, and seek help. Headless UI, while still being widely used, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available in comparison.
In summary, the key differences between Headless UI and Material-UI lie in their approach to component styles, design language, component ecosystem, accessibility, developer experience, and community support.
Pros of Headless UI
Pros of Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component26
- Looks great15
- Responsive13
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Flexible6
- Code examples6
- JSS5
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Interface3
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Accessibility1
- Easy to work with1
- Css1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Headless UI
Cons of Material-UI
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation36
- Hard to customize29
- Hard to understand Docs22
- Bad performance9
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers7
- For editable table component need to use material-table7
- Typescript Support2
- # of components1