StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Helios vs Jenkins

Helios vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Helios
Helios
Stacks21
Followers74
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.2K
Forks233

Helios vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Helios and Jenkins are both popular continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD) tools used in software development processes. Let's explore the key differences between the two.

  1. Ease of Use: Helios provides a more user-friendly interface and an intuitive workflow for defining and managing CI/CD pipelines. It offers a simpler and more streamlined user experience compared to Jenkins, making it easier for developers to adopt and use.

  2. Configuration as Code: Helios embraces the concept of "Configuration as Code" by allowing developers to define and manage CI/CD pipelines using code-based configurations. This enables version control, easier collaboration, and scalability, unlike Jenkins, which relies more on UI-based configurations.

  3. Built-in Containerization Support: Helios has built-in support for containerization technologies like Docker, allowing developers to easily define and manage containerized environments for their CI/CD pipelines. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires additional plugins and configurations to achieve similar functionality.

  4. Scale and Performance: Helios is designed to scale horizontally, enabling it to handle larger workloads and distribute jobs across multiple nodes or agents efficiently. Jenkins, although capable of scaling as well, may require additional setups and configurations to achieve similar levels of scalability.

  5. Native Continuous Deployment: Helios provides native support for continuous deployment, allowing developers to automatically deploy their applications to various environments (e.g., staging, production) as part of the CI/CD process. Jenkins, while capable of achieving continuous deployment through plugins, may require more configuration and setup.

  6. Ecosystem and Integration: Jenkins has been in the market for a longer time, resulting in a more extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations with other tools and technologies. It offers a wider range of options for customization and integration compared to Helios, which is relatively newer and may have a more limited set of integrations.

In summary, Helios is a cloud-native continuous integration and delivery platform, providing a streamlined and scalable environment for building, testing, and deploying applications. Jenkins, on the other hand, is an open-source automation server that supports building, deploying, and automating any project. While Helios emphasizes cloud-native capabilities, Jenkins is known for its extensibility and community-driven plugins, making it adaptable to a wide range of development environments and workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Helios

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Helios
Helios

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Helios is a Docker orchestration platform for deploying and managing containers across an entire fleet of servers. Helios provides a HTTP API as well as a command-line client to interact with servers running your containers.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Helios is pragmatic.; Helios fits into the way you already do ops.;Hihgly scalable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
2.2K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
233
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
21
Followers
50.4K
Followers
74
Votes
2.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Helios?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana