Horizon vs OpenShift

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift

Stacks1.6K

Followers1.4K

Votes517

GitHub Stars885

Forks510

Horizon

Stacks22

Followers56

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.8K

Forks348

Horizon vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Horizon and OpenShift are both popular open-source platforms that help manage and deploy applications in the cloud. However, there are key differences between the two.

Architecture: Horizon is a cloud-computing platform that provides infrastructure as a service (IaaS), allowing users to create and manage virtual machines. On the other hand, OpenShift is a container platform that uses a platform as a service (PaaS) model, providing developers with a platform to build, deploy, and manage applications.
Containerization: OpenShift uses containers, specifically Docker containers, to package and deploy applications. It provides a platform for managing and orchestrating these containers, allowing for easy scalability and deployment. Horizon, on the other hand, does not have native support for containers and focuses more on virtualization.
Ease of Use: Horizon provides a user-friendly web interface for managing virtual machines, networks, and storage resources. It is designed to be easy to use and requires minimal technical expertise. OpenShift, on the other hand, is more developer-centric and provides tools and features specifically for application development and deployment.
Scalability and Flexibility: OpenShift offers more flexibility and scalability compared to Horizon. It supports scaling applications horizontally by adding more container instances, allowing developers to handle increased traffic and load. Horizon, on the other hand, focuses more on vertical scalability, allowing users to allocate more resources to individual virtual machines.
Integration and Ecosystem: OpenShift has a strong integration with other widely used container-related tools and technologies, such as Kubernetes and Docker. It also has a robust ecosystem of plugins and extensions that can enhance its functionality. Horizon, being more focused on traditional virtualization, may not have the same level of integration and ecosystem as OpenShift.
Community and Support: OpenShift has a large and active community of developers and users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. It also benefits from the backing of Red Hat, a well-established software company. Horizon, although it also has a community of users, may not have the same level of support and resources available.

In Summary, Horizon and OpenShift differ in their architecture, containerization, ease of use, scalability, integration, and community support. While Horizon focuses on virtualization and providing infrastructure as a service, OpenShift is more centered around containers and offers a platform as a service for application development and deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift	Horizon
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.	Horizon provides a complete backend that makes it dramatically simpler to build, deploy, manage, and scale engaging JavaScript web and mobile apps. Horizon is extensible, integrates with the Node.js stack, and allows building modern, arbitrarily complex applications.
Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 885	GitHub Stars 6.8K
GitHub Forks 510	GitHub Forks 348
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 22
Followers 1.4K	Followers 56
Votes 517	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 99 Good free plan 63 Open Source 47 Easy setup 43 Nodejs support 42 Well documented Cons 2 Decisions are made for you, limiting your options 2 License cost 1 Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	RethinkDB GraphQL JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, Horizon?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Horizon vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Horizon and OpenShift are both popular open-source platforms that help manage and deploy applications in the cloud. However, there are key differences between the two.

Architecture: Horizon is a cloud-computing platform that provides infrastructure as a service (IaaS), allowing users to create and manage virtual machines. On the other hand, OpenShift is a container platform that uses a platform as a service (PaaS) model, providing developers with a platform to build, deploy, and manage applications.
Containerization: OpenShift uses containers, specifically Docker containers, to package and deploy applications. It provides a platform for managing and orchestrating these containers, allowing for easy scalability and deployment. Horizon, on the other hand, does not have native support for containers and focuses more on virtualization.
Ease of Use: Horizon provides a user-friendly web interface for managing virtual machines, networks, and storage resources. It is designed to be easy to use and requires minimal technical expertise. OpenShift, on the other hand, is more developer-centric and provides tools and features specifically for application development and deployment.
Scalability and Flexibility: OpenShift offers more flexibility and scalability compared to Horizon. It supports scaling applications horizontally by adding more container instances, allowing developers to handle increased traffic and load. Horizon, on the other hand, focuses more on vertical scalability, allowing users to allocate more resources to individual virtual machines.
Integration and Ecosystem: OpenShift has a strong integration with other widely used container-related tools and technologies, such as Kubernetes and Docker. It also has a robust ecosystem of plugins and extensions that can enhance its functionality. Horizon, being more focused on traditional virtualization, may not have the same level of integration and ecosystem as OpenShift.
Community and Support: OpenShift has a large and active community of developers and users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. It also benefits from the backing of Red Hat, a well-established software company. Horizon, although it also has a community of users, may not have the same level of support and resources available.

Horizon vs OpenShift

Overview