Hound
Hound

28
27
13
Scrutinizer
Scrutinizer

64
39
20
Add tool

Hound vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

What is Hound? A hosted service that comments on Ruby style guide violations in your GitHub pull requests. Take care of pesky code reviews with a trusty Hound. Hound reviews GitHub pull requests for style guide violations.

What is Scrutinizer? Continuous inspection platform - improve code quality and find bugs before they hit production. Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

Hound and Scrutinizer can be categorized as "Code Review" tools.

Some of the features offered by Hound are:

  • Open source
  • Free for public repos
  • Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests for style guide violations

On the other hand, Scrutinizer provides the following key features:

  • Continuously measure and track your code quality
  • Project quality broken down
  • Know your problem areas

"Comments on style so I don't have to" is the primary reason why developers consider Hound over the competitors, whereas "Github integration / sync" was stated as the key factor in picking Scrutinizer.

Hound is an open source tool with 1.72K GitHub stars and 393 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Hound's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Scrutinizer has a broader approval, being mentioned in 17 company stacks & 7 developers stacks; compared to Hound, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Hound?

Take care of pesky code reviews with a trusty Hound. Hound reviews GitHub pull requests for style guide violations.

What is Scrutinizer?

Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Hound?
Why do developers choose Scrutinizer?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using Hound?
What are the cons of using Scrutinizer?
    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Hound?
    What companies use Scrutinizer?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Hound?
    What tools integrate with Scrutinizer?
    What are some alternatives to Hound and Scrutinizer?
    ESLint
    A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
    SonarQube
    SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
    Code Climate
    After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
    Prettier
    Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.
    Codacy
    Codacy is an automated code review tool for Scala, Java, Ruby, JavaScript, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS. It's continuous static analysis without the hassle. Save time in Code Reviews. Tackle your technical debt
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Hound and Scrutinizer
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Hound and Scrutinizer
    No reviews found
    How developers use Hound and Scrutinizer
    Avatar of Björn Pfoster
    Björn Pfoster uses ScrutinizerScrutinizer

    Easy code analysis tool

    Avatar of Dieter Adriaenssens
    Dieter Adriaenssens uses ScrutinizerScrutinizer

    Verifies code quality

    How much does Hound cost?
    How much does Scrutinizer cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Hound
    More news
    News about Scrutinizer
    More news