Hudson vs Jenkins

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Hudson

12
18
+ 1
0
Jenkins

57.5K
49K
+ 1
2.2K
Add tool

Hudson vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Background: Hudson and Jenkins are both popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery. However, Jenkins is an open-source software forked from Hudson. The key difference lies in their development and community support.
  2. 2. Development and Community Support: Hudson is a project developed by Sun Microsystems, which was later acquired by Oracle. The development of Hudson slowed down and the community support declined after Oracle introduced a new licensing approach. On the other hand, Jenkins emerged as a community-driven project with an active community backing its development and providing continuous improvement.
  3. 3. Plugin Ecosystem: Jenkins has a larger and more active plugin ecosystem compared to Hudson. The community-driven development of Jenkins has led to numerous plugins being created and maintained, allowing users to extend and customize its functionalities to suit their specific requirements. In contrast, Hudson's plugin ecosystem is less active and does not offer the same level of flexibility.
  4. 4. User Interface: Jenkins has a more modern and user-friendly user interface compared to Hudson. The user interface of Jenkins is customizable and allows users to create personalized dashboards, views, and widgets. On the other hand, Hudson has a more traditional and less intuitive interface, which may require more effort to navigate and configure.
  5. 5. Build and Distribution: Jenkins has a more efficient and flexible build and distribution system compared to Hudson. Jenkins allows users to define complex build processes using pipelines, which can be version controlled and automated. Additionally, Jenkins supports distributed builds, where multiple nodes can be utilized to distribute the workload. Hudson, on the other hand, has a more limited build and distribution system.
  6. 6. Support and Documentation: Jenkins has a more extensive and updated documentation, as well as a larger active community that provides support and assistance to users. Hudson, due to its declining community support, may have outdated documentation and limited community-driven assistance available.

In Summary, Jenkins, an open-source project with active community support, offers a more modern user interface, a larger plugin ecosystem, a flexible build system, and extensive support and documentation compared to Hudson.

Advice on Hudson and Jenkins
Needs advice
on
Azure PipelinesAzure Pipelines
and
JenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
GitHubGitHub

If your source code is on GitHub, also take a look at Github actions. https://github.com/features/actions

See more
Mohammad Hossein Amri
Chief Technology Officer at Planally · | 3 upvotes · 493.1K views
Needs advice
on
GoCDGoCD
and
JenkinsJenkins

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

See more
Replies (1)
Ankit Malik
Software Developer at CloudCover · | 1 upvotes · 475.8K views
Recommends
on
Google Cloud BuildGoogle Cloud Build

Google cloud build can help you. It is hosted on cloud and also provide reasonable free quota.

See more
Needs advice
on
ConcourseConcourse
and
JenkinsJenkins

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

See more
Replies (1)
Maxi Krone
Cloud Engineer at fme AG · | 2 upvotes · 394.6K views
Recommends
on
ConcourseConcourse

I would definetly recommend Concourse to you, as it is one of the most advanced modern methods of making CI/CD while Jenkins is an old monolithic dinosaur. Concourse itself is cloudnative and containerbased which helps you to build simple, high-performance and scalable CI/CD pipelines. In my opinion, the only lack of skills you have with Concourse is your own knowledge of how to build pipelines and automate things. Technincally there is no lack, i would even say you can extend it way more easily. But as a Con it is more easy to interact with Jenkins if you are only used to UIs. Concourse needs someone which is capable of using CLIs.

See more
Needs advice
on
JenkinsJenkinsTravis CITravis CI
and
CircleCICircleCI

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

See more
Replies (6)
Dustin Falgout
Senior Developer at Elegant Themes · | 13 upvotes · 545.7K views

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

See more
Peter Thomas
Distinguished Engineer at Intuit · | 9 upvotes · 855.8K views
Recommends
on
Travis CITravis CI
at

As the maintainer of the Karate DSL open-source project - I found Travis CI very easy to integrate into the GitHub workflow and it has been steady sailing for more than 2 years now ! It works well for Java / Apache Maven projects and we were able to configure it to use the latest Oracle JDK as per our needs. Thanks to the Travis CI team for this service to the open-source community !

See more
Recommends
on
Google Cloud BuildGoogle Cloud Build

I use Google Cloud Build because it's my first foray into the CICD world(loving it so far), and I wanted to work with something GCP native to avoid giving permissions to other SaaS tools like CircleCI and Travis CI.

I really like it because it's free for the first 120 minutes, and it's one of the few CICD tools that enterprises are open to using since it's contained within GCP.

One of the unique things is that it has the Kaniko cache, which speeds up builds by creating intermediate layers within the docker image vs. pushing the full thing from the start. Helpful when you're installing just a few additional dependencies.

Feel free to checkout an example: Cloudbuild Example

See more
Recommends
on
Travis CITravis CI

I use Travis CI because of various reasons - 1. Cloud based system so no dedicated server required, and you do not need to administrate it. 2. Easy YAML configuration. 3. Supports Major Programming Languages. 4. Support of build matrix 6. Supports AWS, Azure, Docker, Heroku, Google Cloud, Github Pages, PyPi and lot more. 7. Slack Notifications.

See more
Oded Arbel
Recommends
on
GitLab CIGitLab CI

You are probably looking at another hosted solution: Jenkins is a good tool but it way too work intensive to be used as just a backup solution.

I have good experience with Circle-CI, Codeship, Drone.io and Travis (as well as problematic experiences with all of them), but my go-to tool is Gitlab CI: simple, powerful and if you have problems with their limitations or pricing, you can always install runners somewhere and use Gitlab just for scheduling and management. Even if you don't host your git repository at Gitlab, you can have Gitlab pull changes automatically from wherever you repo lives.

See more
Recommends
on
BuildkiteBuildkite

If you are considering Jenkins I would recommend at least checking out Buildkite. The agents are self-hosted (like Jenkins) but the interface is hosted for you. It meshes up some of the things I like about hosted services (pipeline definitions in YAML, managed interface and authentication) with things I like about Jenkins (local customizable agent images, secrets only on own instances, custom agent level scripts, sizing instances to your needs).

See more
Decisions about Hudson and Jenkins

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Hudson
Pros of Jenkins
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 523
      Hosted internally
    • 469
      Free open source
    • 318
      Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
    • 243
      Tons of integrations
    • 211
      Rich set of plugins with good documentation
    • 111
      Has support for build pipelines
    • 68
      Easy setup
    • 66
      It is open-source
    • 53
      Workflow plugin
    • 13
      Configuration as code
    • 12
      Very powerful tool
    • 11
      Many Plugins
    • 10
      Continuous Integration
    • 10
      Great flexibility
    • 9
      Git and Maven integration is better
    • 8
      100% free and open source
    • 7
      Slack Integration (plugin)
    • 7
      Github integration
    • 6
      Self-hosted GitLab Integration (plugin)
    • 6
      Easy customisation
    • 5
      Pipeline API
    • 5
      Docker support
    • 4
      Fast builds
    • 4
      Hosted Externally
    • 4
      Excellent docker integration
    • 4
      Platform idnependency
    • 3
      AWS Integration
    • 3
      JOBDSL
    • 3
      It's Everywhere
    • 3
      Customizable
    • 3
      Can be run as a Docker container
    • 3
      It`w worked
    • 2
      Loose Coupling
    • 2
      NodeJS Support
    • 2
      Build PR Branch Only
    • 2
      Easily extendable with seamless integration
    • 2
      PHP Support
    • 2
      Ruby/Rails Support
    • 2
      Universal controller

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Hudson
    Cons of Jenkins
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 13
        Workarounds needed for basic requirements
      • 10
        Groovy with cumbersome syntax
      • 8
        Plugins compatibility issues
      • 7
        Lack of support
      • 7
        Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
      • 5
        No YAML syntax
      • 4
        Too tied to plugins versions

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Hudson?

      It monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently it focuses on the two jobs

      What is Jenkins?

      In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention Hudson and Jenkins as a desired skillset
      What companies use Hudson?
      What companies use Jenkins?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Hudson or Jenkins.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Hudson?
      What tools integrate with Jenkins?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Mar 24 2021 at 12:57PM

      Pinterest

      GitJenkinsKafka+7
      3
      2139
      GitJenkinsGroovy+4
      4
      2641
      Dec 4 2019 at 8:01PM

      Pinterest

      KubernetesJenkinsTensorFlow+4
      5
      3274
      GitHubGitPython+22
      17
      14208
      JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
      53
      21853
      What are some alternatives to Hudson and Jenkins?
      Travis CI
      Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.
      GitHub Actions
      It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
      CircleCI
      Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
      GitLab CI
      GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
      Azure Pipelines
      Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.
      See all alternatives