StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Web Service Automation
  5. IFTTT vs Joomla!

IFTTT vs Joomla!

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

IFTTT
IFTTT
Stacks298
Followers289
Votes72
Joomla!
Joomla!
Stacks1.5K
Followers337
Votes37
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks3.7K

IFTTT vs Joomla!: What are the differences?

  1. Integration Functionality: IFTTT focuses on providing users with a platform to create automated tasks by connecting different apps and services. On the other hand, Joomla! is a content management system that is primarily used for creating and managing websites. IFTTT is more focused on automation and integration between various online services, while Joomla! serves as a platform for website development and management.
  2. User Base: IFTTT is targeted towards a wide range of users who want to streamline their online activities and automate tasks, including both individuals and businesses. In contrast, Joomla! is mainly used by web developers, designers, and website administrators for creating and managing websites. While IFTTT caters to a broad audience with its automation features, Joomla! is more specialized towards website development professionals.
  3. Cost: IFTTT offers a free version with limited functionality and a paid subscription for more advanced features. Joomla!, on the other hand, is an open-source platform that is free to use, but users may incur costs for hosting, extensions, and customizations. The cost structure of IFTTT and Joomla! differs in terms of subscription plans and additional expenses related to website development.
  4. Customization: IFTTT allows users to create custom applets using a variety of services and triggers to automate tasks. In contrast, Joomla! offers extensive customization options through templates, extensions, and modules to build unique and tailored websites. While IFTTT focuses on automating tasks between different services, Joomla! provides flexibility for users to customize their website design and functionality.
  5. Primary Function: The primary function of IFTTT is to create automated tasks based on predefined triggers and actions, simplifying online workflows and activities. On the other hand, Joomla! is designed as a content management system for organizing and publishing digital content on websites, offering features for creating and managing website structure and design. IFTTT is more focused on automation, while Joomla! serves as a comprehensive platform for website development.
  6. Community Support: IFTTT has a strong online community that shares applet ideas, troubleshooting tips, and support for users looking to leverage automation in their online tasks. Joomla! also boasts a robust community of developers, designers, and users who provide support, templates, extensions, and resources for building and managing Joomla! websites. Both platforms benefit from active communities that enhance user experiences through shared knowledge and resources.

In Summary, the key differences between IFTTT and Joomla! lie in their focus on integration functionality, user base, cost structure, customization options, primary functions, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on IFTTT, Joomla!

Dragos
Dragos

Jan 6, 2020

Decided

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

IFTTT
IFTTT
Joomla!
Joomla!

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Solutions by industry; Built for creators and makers; Customize with queries and code
User Management;Media Manager;Language Manager;Banner Management;Contact Management; Polls;Search;Web Link Management;Content Management;Syndication and Newsfeed Management;Menu Manager;Template Management;Integrated Help System;System Features;Web Services;Powerful Extensibility
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.7K
Stacks
298
Stacks
1.5K
Followers
289
Followers
337
Votes
72
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Lots of integrations
  • 17
    Free
  • 12
    Automates manual tasks
  • 11
    Life automation
  • 7
    Internet of things
Pros
  • 17
    Powerful extension architecture
  • 6
    Powerfull CMS
  • 5
    Mid-Hight End level CMS
  • 4
    Highly customizable
  • 2
    Vast repository of free and paid extensions
Cons
  • 1
    Depleting dev community

What are some alternatives to IFTTT, Joomla!?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

n8n

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack