Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

IOpipe

12
13
+ 1
2
IronWorker

25
17
+ 1
0
Add tool

IOpipe vs IronWorker: What are the differences?

What is IOpipe? Observability for serverless applications on AWS Lambda. Develop faster with realtime errors, metrics, logs, and profiling. Operate with confidence with monitoring and tracing for AWS Lambda based Serverless applications.

What is IronWorker? High-Scale Async Task Processing. IronWorker provides the muscle for modern applications by efficiently isolating the code and dependencies of individual tasks to be processed on demand. Run in a multi-language containerized environment with streamlined orchestration, IronWorker gives you the flexibility to power any task in parallel at massive scale.

IOpipe belongs to "Performance Monitoring" category of the tech stack, while IronWorker can be primarily classified under "Serverless / Task Processing".

Some of the features offered by IOpipe are:

  • metrics
  • tracing
  • profiling

On the other hand, IronWorker provides the following key features:

  • Containerized Environment
  • High-Scale Processing
  • Flexible Scheduling
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of IOpipe
Pros of IronWorker
  • 2
    Easy to setup, automatic tracing, and super intuitive
  • 0
    Ease of configuration
  • 0
    Great customer support
  • 0
    Fully on-premise deployable
  • 0
    Cloud agnostic
  • 0
    Language agnostic
  • 0
    Can run Docker containers

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is IOpipe?

Develop faster with realtime errors, metrics, logs, and profiling. Operate with confidence with monitoring and tracing for AWS Lambda based Serverless applications.

What is IronWorker?

IronWorker provides the muscle for modern applications by efficiently isolating the code and dependencies of individual tasks to be processed on demand. Run in a multi-language containerized environment with streamlined orchestration, IronWorker gives you the flexibility to power any task in parallel at massive scale.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use IOpipe?
What companies use IronWorker?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with IOpipe?
What tools integrate with IronWorker?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to IOpipe and IronWorker?
    Dashbird
    Dashbird gives full visibility into serverless architectures. Failure detection, monitoring and debugging capabilities for AWS Lambda and event sources. Get up and running in 5 minutes without any performance overhead or code changes.
    Thundra
    By eliminating the need for multiple tools in pre-production. Thundra provides observability into the CI process, helps optimize build duration, enables more frequent deployments, higher development productivity, and lower CI costs.
    New Relic
    The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.
    Kibana
    Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.
    Grafana
    Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.
    See all alternatives