Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

JAWS

5
49
+ 1
2
Play

746
605
+ 1
496
Yesod

35
41
+ 1
15

JAWS vs Play vs Yesod: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing a web development framework, it is important to understand the key differences between JAWS, Play, and Yesod to make an informed decision based on your specific needs and requirements.

  1. Language Support: JAWS is primarily used with JavaScript, while Play is designed for use with Java and Scala, and Yesod is based on Haskell. This difference in programming languages can impact factors such as development speed, learning curve, and available libraries for each framework.

  2. Learning Curve: JAWS is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice for beginners. In contrast, Play and Yesod may have a steeper learning curve due to their more advanced features and functional programming paradigms.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Play has a large and active community that contributes to its growing ecosystem of plugins, libraries, and resources. Yesod, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community that emphasizes strong typing and high performance. JAWS, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.

  4. Performance: Yesod, with its focus on high performance and type safety, may outperform JAWS and Play in certain scenarios. However, JAWS's lightweight nature and simplicity can also lead to good performance, especially for smaller projects.

  5. Scalability: Play is known for its scalability and is often used for large-scale applications due to its built-in support for handling concurrent requests efficiently. Yesod, with its emphasis on type safety and performance, may also offer good scalability. JAWS, being lightweight and easy to use, may be suitable for smaller projects with less demand for scalability.

  6. Flexibility and Extensibility: Play's modular design allows for easy extension and customization through plugins and modules. Yesod, with its strong typing and leveraging of Haskell's expressive type system, offers a high level of flexibility. JAWS, being simple and lightweight, may lack some of the advanced features and extensibility options of Play and Yesod.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between JAWS, Play, and Yesod in terms of language support, learning curve, community, performance, scalability, and flexibility is crucial for choosing the right web development framework for your project.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of JAWS
Pros of Play
Pros of Yesod
  • 2
    Heroku
  • 81
    Scala
  • 55
    Web-friendly architecture
  • 55
    Built on akka
  • 50
    Stateless
  • 47
    High-scalable
  • 46
    Fast
  • 40
    Open source
  • 34
    Java
  • 27
    High velocity
  • 24
    Fun
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 8
    Non-blocking io
  • 6
    Developer friendly
  • 5
    Simple template engine
  • 4
    Scalability
  • 3
    Pure love
  • 2
    Resource efficient
  • 6
    Haskell
  • 4
    Super High Performance
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Type safe URLs

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of JAWS
Cons of Play
Cons of Yesod
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Evolves fast, keep up with releases
    • 1
      Unnecessarily complicated
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is JAWS?

      The Javascript + AWS Stack – A server-free, webapp boilerplate using bleeding-edge AWS services that redefine how to build massively scalable web applications

      What is Play?

      Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

      What is Yesod?

      Yesod believes in the philosophy of making the compiler your ally, not your enemy. We use the type system to enforce as much as possible, from generating proper links, to avoiding XSS attacks, to dealing with character encoding issues. In general, if your code compiles, it works. And instead of declaring types everywhere you let the compiler figure them out for you with type inference.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use JAWS?
      What companies use Play?
      What companies use Yesod?
        No companies found

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with JAWS?
        What tools integrate with Play?
        What tools integrate with Yesod?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to JAWS, Play, and Yesod?
        Node.js
        Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
        Django
        Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
        ASP.NET
        .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.
        Laravel
        It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.
        Android SDK
        Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.
        See all alternatives