StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Laravel Forge

Jenkins vs Laravel Forge

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge
Stacks233
Followers273
Votes4

Jenkins vs Laravel Forge: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability and Cloud Support: Jenkins is a self-hosted solution that allows users to set up and scale their own infrastructure as per their requirement. On the other hand, Laravel Forge is a cloud-based managed service by Laravel that provides an easy and scalable solution without the need for infrastructure management.

  2. Ease of Use: Jenkins is a powerful and highly customizable open-source automation tool, but it requires in-depth technical knowledge and configuration skills to set up and maintain. In contrast, Laravel Forge has a user-friendly interface and provides a streamlined experience for developers, making it easier to set up and manage servers.

  3. Integration with Laravel Ecosystem: Laravel Forge is specifically designed for Laravel applications and offers seamless integration with Laravel's ecosystem, including features like automated deployment, one-click SSL certificate installations, and easy configuration for Laravel projects. Jenkins, being a general-purpose automation tool, requires additional plugins and configuration to achieve similar functionalities.

  4. Backup and Monitoring: Laravel Forge provides built-in backup and monitoring features for servers, making it easy to schedule automated backups and monitor server performance. On the other hand, Jenkins does not have these features out-of-the-box and requires additional plugins and configurations for backup and monitoring.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: Jenkins has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support resources available. Users can find a wide range of plugins, tutorials, and solutions for commonly faced issues. Laravel Forge, being a product by Laravel, also has a supportive community and detailed documentation specifically tailored towards Laravel applications.

  6. Cost: Jenkins is an open-source tool and is free to use. However, it requires a dedicated server infrastructure and maintenance, which might incur costs. Laravel Forge has a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on the number of servers and additional features. The cost of using Laravel Forge depends on the specific requirements and usage.

In Summary, Jenkins and Laravel Forge differ in terms of scalability, ease of use, integration with Laravel ecosystem, backup and monitoring features, community support, and cost. Laravel Forge provides a cloud-based managed service specifically designed for Laravel applications, offering a more streamlined and user-friendly experience, while Jenkins is a powerful and customizable automation tool that requires technical knowledge and infrastructure management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Laravel Forge

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
233
Followers
50.4K
Followers
273
Votes
2.2K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 4
    Simply to use
Cons
  • 2
    Monthly subscription

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Laravel Forge?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana