Jinja2 vs UIkIt

Overview

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

Jinja

Stacks2.3K

Followers292

Votes8

GitHub Stars11.2K

Forks1.7K

Jinja2 vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Developers describe Jinja2 as "Full featured template engine for Python". Jinja2 is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed. On the other hand, UIkIt is detailed as "A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces". UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Jinja2 and UIkIt are primarily classified as "Templating Languages & Extensions" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.

"It is simple to use" is the top reason why over 4 developers like Jinja2, while over 25 developers mention "Complete GUI" as the leading cause for choosing UIkIt.

Jinja2 and UIkIt are both open source tools. It seems that UIkIt with 14.6K GitHub stars and 2.1K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Jinja2 with 6.25K GitHub stars and 1.21K GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, UIkIt has a broader approval, being mentioned in 45 company stacks & 9 developers stacks; compared to Jinja2, which is listed in 20 company stacks and 23 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on UIkIt, Jinja

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt	Jinja
UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.	It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.
LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.	Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 18.5K	GitHub Stars 11.2K
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 1.7K
Stacks 791	Stacks 2.3K
Followers 417	Followers 292
Votes 262	Votes 8
Pros & Cons
Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Functional 24 Easy to learn	Pros 8 It is simple to use
Integrations
No integrations available	Ember.js Git JavaScript Python Node.js

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, Jinja?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Related Comparisons

"It is simple to use" is the top reason why over 4 developers like Jinja2, while over 25 developers mention "Complete GUI" as the leading cause for choosing UIkIt.

Jinja2 vs UIkIt