Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Maven vs JitPack: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Apache Maven and JitPack
Apache Maven and JitPack are popular tools used in software development projects. While both tools focus on managing dependencies and building projects, there are some key differences between them. Here are the specific differences:
Dependency Management: Apache Maven is a build tool and project management tool that provides extensive support for dependency management. It allows developers to specify dependencies in a Project Object Model (POM) file, which is used to download and manage the required libraries automatically. JitPack, on the other hand, is primarily a package repository that supports Gradle and Maven builds, but it does not provide the same level of dependency management features as Maven.
Build Configuration: Maven uses an XML-based configuration file called POM.xml (Project Object Model) to define the project structure, dependencies, and build configuration. It follows a convention-over-configuration approach, which means that developers need to adhere to specific directory structures and naming conventions. JitPack, on the other hand, relies on the build configuration file already defined in the project (such as Gradle or Maven) and does not require any additional configuration.
Continuous Integration Support: Apache Maven has extensive support for continuous integration (CI) systems and can be easily integrated with tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, or Travis CI. It provides features like automatic building, testing, and deployment of projects. JitPack, on the other hand, does not have built-in continuous integration support but can be used with popular CI systems by using the appropriate build configuration file (e.g., .travis.yml for Travis CI).
Project Hosting: Apache Maven relies on a central repository called Maven Central, which hosts a vast collection of open-source libraries and artifacts. It allows developers to easily search and download dependencies for their projects. JitPack, on the other hand, hosts projects directly from source repositories like GitHub. It uses the Git tags or commits to build and package the projects, making it easy to use and distribute projects that are not available in Maven Central.
Distribution Mechanism: Maven distributes packages as pre-compiled binary artifacts (JAR, WAR, etc.) and relies on Maven Central as the distribution platform. JitPack, on the other hand, distributes packages directly from the source code. It builds the projects on-demand, allowing developers to easily consume bleeding-edge or unreleased versions of libraries.
Usage in Gradle and Maven: Maven is primarily used with its own build tool, but it can also be integrated into Gradle builds using plugins. JitPack, on the other hand, is built to work seamlessly with both Gradle and Maven build tools, providing developers with flexibility in choosing the preferred tool for their projects.
In summary, Apache Maven is a comprehensive build and dependency management tool with strong support for CI systems, central repository hosting, and extensive configuration options. JitPack, on the other hand, is a lightweight package repository that simplifies the distribution of projects directly from the source code, providing easy access to bleeding-edge versions and seamless integration with Gradle and Maven builds.
Pros of JitPack
- Because uploading to maven central is a ball ache12
Pros of Apache Maven
- Dependency management138
- Necessary evil70
- I’d rather code my app, not my build60
- Publishing packaged artifacts48
- Convention over configuration43
- Modularisation18
- Consistency across builds11
- Prevents overengineering using scripting6
- Runs Tests4
- Lot of cool plugins4
- Extensible3
- Hard to customize2
- Runs on Linux2
- Runs on OS X1
- Slow incremental build1
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Undeterminisc1
- Good IDE tooling1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of JitPack
Cons of Apache Maven
- Complex6
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Not many plugin-alternatives0