StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. JSON Server vs Sandbox

JSON Server vs Sandbox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSON Server
JSON Server
Stacks133
Followers189
Votes7
GitHub Stars75.3K
Forks7.2K
Sandbox
Sandbox
Stacks28
Followers55
Votes0
GitHub Stars6
Forks5

JSON Server vs Sandbox: What are the differences?

<JSON Server and Sandbox are both tools used for mocking APIs during development. They serve different purposes and have distinct features that cater to specific needs. In this Markdown code, we will highlight the key differences between JSON Server and Sandbox to help users understand which tool might be more suitable for their project.>

  1. Data Persistence: JSON Server allows you to save data to a db.json file, providing a way to persist data between server restarts. On the other hand, Sandbox does not have built-in data persistence capabilities, requiring you to manually handle data storage if needed.

  2. Dynamic Responses: JSON Server enables you to create dynamic responses using JavaScript functions, making it easier to simulate complex backend logic. In contrast, Sandbox focuses on providing a simple and static API mocking environment without the ability to generate dynamic responses.

  3. Middleware Support: JSON Server offers middleware support, allowing you to customize requests and responses with additional logic or modifications. Sandbox, however, does not support middleware, limiting the flexibility in handling HTTP requests.

  4. Custom Routes: JSON Server allows you to define custom routes for handling specific endpoints and operations, giving you more control over the API behavior. In contrast, Sandbox follows a more rigid structure, making it less customizable in terms of defining custom routes.

  5. Real-time Updates: JSON Server provides real-time updates to connected clients when data changes, facilitating a dynamic and interactive development experience. Sandbox does not support real-time updates, meaning changes to data require manual interaction to reflect in the API responses.

  6. API Documentation: JSON Server automatically generates API documentation based on the defined routes and resources, making it easier to understand and explore the available endpoints. In comparison, Sandbox does not offer automatic API documentation generation, requiring developers to manually document the API structure.

In Summary, JSON Server excels in data persistence, dynamic responses, middleware support, custom routes, real-time updates, and API documentation generation compared to Sandbox.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSON Server
JSON Server
Sandbox
Sandbox

Created with <3 for front-end developers who need a quick back-end for prototyping and mocking.

Quickly mock RESTful API or SOAP web-services with simple or dynamic responses, and fault injection to simulate real application behaviour.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
75.3K
GitHub Stars
6
GitHub Forks
7.2K
GitHub Forks
5
Stacks
133
Stacks
28
Followers
189
Followers
55
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Stupid simple
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Apiary
Apiary
Swagger UI
Swagger UI
RAML
RAML

What are some alternatives to JSON Server, Sandbox?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope