StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. JSON Web Token vs ORY Kratos

JSON Web Token vs ORY Kratos

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
Stacks14
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.5K
Forks1.1K

JSON Web Token vs ORY Kratos: What are the differences?

Introduction

JSON Web Token (JWT) and ORY Kratos are both authentication and authorization technologies widely used in web applications. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore and highlight the main differences between JSON Web Token and ORY Kratos.

  1. Token Structure: JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact and self-contained token that consists of three parts: a header, a payload, and a signature. The header contains metadata, the payload stores the actual claims or data, and the signature verifies the integrity of the token. On the other hand, ORY Kratos uses a different token structure, which is highly flexible and extensible. It allows the inclusion of arbitrary data and additional fields besides the standard claims.

  2. Authentication Methods: While both JWT and ORY Kratos provide authentication capabilities, they differ in the authentication methods they support. JWT primarily relies on cryptographic mechanisms, such as signing with private keys, to authenticate tokens. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, offers a broader range of authentication options, including username/password-based authentication, multifactor authentication, and integration with third-party identity providers like OAuth and OpenID Connect.

  3. Token Management and Revocation: JWT tokens are stateless, meaning the server does not store any information about issued tokens. As a result, JWT tokens cannot be effectively invalidated or revoked before their expiration. In contrast, ORY Kratos provides built-in token management and revocation mechanisms. Tokens issued by ORY Kratos can be revoked by the server, thus enhancing security and control over active sessions.

  4. Flexibility and Extensibility: JSON Web Token (JWT) follows a well-defined structure, and the available claims are standardized. While this allows for interoperability and ease of implementation, it limits the flexibility and extensibility of the token format. ORY Kratos, however, offers more flexibility in terms of token customization. It allows developers to define custom claims, metadata, and additional fields based on their specific application requirements.

  5. Single Sign-On (SSO) Support: One of the notable differences between JWT and ORY Kratos is the support for Single Sign-On (SSO). While JWT alone does not provide built-in SSO capabilities, it can be utilized as a part of SSO solutions in combination with other technologies. On the other hand, ORY Kratos natively supports Single Sign-On, allowing seamless authentication across multiple applications and services.

  6. Developer Community and Ecosystem: Both JSON Web Token and ORY Kratos have active developer communities and a growing ecosystem of libraries, tools, and integration options. However, JWT being a standardized and widely adopted technology has a larger community and more extensive ecosystem. This can translate into better support, documentation, and resources for developers implementing JWT-based authentication and authorization solutions.

In Summary, JSON Web Token (JWT) and ORY Kratos differ in their token structure, authentication methods, token management, flexibility, SSO support, and developer community. While both technologies serve authentication and authorization purposes, ORY Kratos offers more extensive features and customization options, particularly suitable for complex authentication scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

It is a cloud native user management system. It provides user login and registration, multi-factor authentication, and user information storage with a headless API. It is fully configurable and supports a wide range of protocols such as Google Authenticator, and stores user information using JSON Schema.

compact;self-contained
Self-service Login and Registration; Multi-Factor Authentication; Account Verification; Account Recovery; Profile and Account Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
12.5K
GitHub Forks
374
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
14
Followers
367
Followers
99
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to JSON Web Token, ORY Kratos?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope