StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs JSP

Apache Tomcat vs JSP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
JSP
JSP
Stacks28
Followers13
Votes0

Apache Tomcat vs JSP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, Apache Tomcat and JSP (JavaServer Pages) are both widely used technologies that play important roles in creating and deploying web applications. While both are related to Java and are commonly used together, there are significant differences between them that web developers should be aware of. This markdown code presents the key differences between Apache Tomcat and JSP in a concise and specific manner.

  1. Deployment Model: Apache Tomcat is a web server and servlet container that is used to host Java web applications. It provides a runtime environment for running Java servlets and JavaServer Pages (JSP). On the other hand, JSP is a technology that allows developers to create dynamic web pages by embedding Java code within HTML pages. While Tomcat provides the infrastructure for hosting the JSP pages, it is the JSP technology itself that enables the dynamic content generation.

  2. Execution Process: When a request is made to a web application hosted on Apache Tomcat, it goes through a series of steps. Tomcat first initializes the servlet container, loads and initializes the servlets and filters, and then processes the request by invoking the appropriate servlet or JSP. In the case of JSP, the JSP files are first compiled into Java servlets before being executed by the servlet container. This compilation process is done automatically by the servlet container when it detects any changes in the JSP files.

  3. Design and Functionality: Apache Tomcat is primarily designed as a web server and servlet container, focusing on providing a runtime environment for Java web applications. It handles the HTTP protocol, manages the servlet lifecycle, and provides various servlet and JSP-related functionalities. On the other hand, JSP is a technology that allows for the separation of presentation logic (HTML) from business logic (Java code). It provides a way to generate dynamic content by embedding Java code within HTML pages, making it easier for developers to create dynamic web applications.

  4. Flexibility and Reusability: Apache Tomcat provides a platform-independent and scalable runtime environment for Java web applications. It can be easily installed and configured on various operating systems and can run any web application that follows the appropriate Java standards. In contrast, JSP provides a way to modularize and reuse code by separating the presentation logic from the business logic. JSP tags and tag libraries allow for the creation of reusable components, making it easier to maintain and update web applications.

  5. Learning Curve: Apache Tomcat requires knowledge of web server configuration and management, as well as servlet and JSP deployment concepts. It involves understanding how to install, configure, and deploy web applications on the server. On the other hand, JSP requires knowledge of Java programming and familiarity with HTML. Developers need to learn how to write JSP code, embed Java code within HTML pages, and understand the lifecycle of JSP files.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Apache Tomcat is designed to handle a large number of concurrent client connections and provides mechanisms for load balancing and clustering to support high scalability and availability. It also provides various performance tuning options to optimize the server's performance. JSP, as a technology, does not directly impact the scalability or performance of the server. However, poorly written JSP code or inefficient use of JSP features can negatively affect the overall performance of the web application.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a web server and servlet container that provides a runtime environment for Java web applications, while JSP is a technology that allows the creation of dynamic web pages by embedding Java code within HTML pages. Apache Tomcat focuses on providing the infrastructure for hosting and managing web applications, while JSP enables the generation of dynamic content.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, JSP

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
JSP
JSP

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

The official Twitter account for the sum of all knowledge, Wikipedia. Overseen by @jeffelder.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
28
Followers
12.6K
Followers
13
Votes
201
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, JSP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase