StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. Juju vs OpenStack

Juju vs OpenStack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138
Juju
Juju
Stacks26
Followers54
Votes0

Juju vs OpenStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Juju and OpenStack are both popular tools in the world of cloud computing. Both tools offer a range of features and functionalities that make it easier to manage and deploy applications in a cloud environment. However, there are some key differences between Juju and OpenStack that users should be aware of. In this article, we will explore these differences in more detail.

  1. Architecture: Juju is a service modeling tool that focuses on abstracting the complexity of the underlying infrastructure. It allows users to define the desired state of the application and then automatically deploys and manages the necessary resources to achieve that state. On the other hand, OpenStack is a cloud operating system that provides a set of interconnected services for building and managing public and private clouds. It offers more granular control over the infrastructure and allows users to provision and manage virtual machines, storage, and networking resources.

  2. Scope: Juju is focused on the application layer and provides a high-level abstraction for deploying and managing applications across different cloud environments. It is agnostic to the underlying infrastructure and can be used with various cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and OpenStack itself. In contrast, OpenStack is a comprehensive cloud computing platform that covers the entire infrastructure stack, including compute, storage, and networking. It is more suitable for organizations looking to build and manage their own private clouds.

  3. Ease of Use: Juju emphasizes ease of use and allows users to deploy and manage applications using a simple command-line interface or a graphical user interface. It provides a range of pre-configured application bundles and integrates with popular DevOps tools like Ansible and Puppet. OpenStack, on the other hand, requires more configuration and expertise to set up and manage. It has a command-line interface and web dashboard, but the learning curve can be steep for users who are new to cloud computing.

  4. Community and Support: Juju has a thriving community and is backed by Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu. It benefits from the extensive ecosystem and support of the Ubuntu community. OpenStack, on the other hand, has a larger and more mature community with contributions from various companies and organizations. It has a dedicated foundation and a vast ecosystem of vendors and service providers.

  5. Scalability and Flexibility: Juju is designed to be highly scalable and flexible. It can easily scale applications up or down depending on the resource requirements. It also supports multi-cloud and hybrid-cloud deployments, allowing users to take advantage of different cloud providers and technologies. OpenStack, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in terms of infrastructure configuration and customization. It allows users to build and manage complex cloud environments with specific hardware and software requirements.

  6. Maturity and Adoption: Juju is a relatively newer tool compared to OpenStack and has seen rapid adoption in recent years. It is gaining popularity among developers and DevOps teams for its simplicity and ease of use. OpenStack, on the other hand, has been around for over a decade and is considered more mature and robust. It is widely used by large enterprises and service providers to build and manage public and private clouds.

In summary, Juju and OpenStack are both powerful tools for managing and deploying applications in a cloud environment. Juju focuses on the application layer and offers a high-level abstraction for managing resources, while OpenStack provides a comprehensive cloud computing platform with more granular control over infrastructure. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the organization using them.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
Juju
Juju

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

It is an open source, application and service modelling tool from Ubuntu that helps you deploy, manage and scale your applications on any cloud.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
Consistent naming; Tagging; Ability to add user-controlled tags to created instances
Statistics
Stacks
790
Stacks
26
Followers
1.2K
Followers
54
Votes
138
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, Juju?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana