OpenYurt vs k3s

Overview

k3s

Stacks97

Followers252

Votes16

OpenYurt

Stacks1

Followers1

Votes0

OpenYurt vs k3s: What are the differences?

Introduction: OpenYurt and k3s are both Kubernetes derivatives that offer lightweight solutions for managing containerized workloads. While they share similarities, there are some key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: OpenYurt is designed to extend the capability of centralized Kubernetes clusters to edge computing environments by distributing Kubernetes control plane components to edge nodes. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution optimized for resource-constrained environments with simplified deployment and management.
Installation and footprint: OpenYurt requires a centralized manager and edge nodes, with specific components running on each. In contrast, k3s aims for minimal resource usage with a single-binary deployment that includes all the necessary Kubernetes components. This results in a smaller footprint compared to OpenYurt.
Edge computing focus: OpenYurt is explicitly built for edge computing scenarios, where resources are limited, network connectivity may be unreliable, and latency requirements are stringent. It provides features such as edge group and edge lattice to facilitate edge computing workloads. While k3s can also be used in edge environments, it does not offer as many specialized features for these use cases.
Management simplicity: k3s offers a simplified installation process and fewer moving parts, making it easier to set up and manage compared to OpenYurt. While OpenYurt is powerful in edge scenarios, this complexity may lead to a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with Kubernetes or edge computing concepts.
Community and ecosystem: k3s has gained significant traction in the Kubernetes community and has a robust ecosystem of tools and resources to support users. OpenYurt, being a more specialized project focused on edge computing, may have a smaller community and fewer third-party integrations available.

In Summary, OpenYurt focuses on extending Kubernetes to the edge with a more complex architecture, while k3s offers a lightweight and simplified Kubernetes distribution suitable for resource-constrained environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

k3s	OpenYurt
Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.	It is built based on native Kubernetes and targets to extend it to support edge computing seamlessly. In a nutshell, it enables users to manage applications that run in the edge infrastructure as if they were running in the cloud infrastructure.
ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support	Kubernetes native; Seamless conversion; Node autonomy; Cloud platform agnostic
Statistics
Stacks 97	Stacks 1
Followers 252	Followers 1
Votes 16	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Lightweight 4 Easy 2 Scale Services 2 Open Source 2 Replication Controller	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes SQLite	Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to k3s, OpenYurt?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

OpenYurt vs k3s: What are the differences?

Architecture: OpenYurt is designed to extend the capability of centralized Kubernetes clusters to edge computing environments by distributing Kubernetes control plane components to edge nodes. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution optimized for resource-constrained environments with simplified deployment and management.
Installation and footprint: OpenYurt requires a centralized manager and edge nodes, with specific components running on each. In contrast, k3s aims for minimal resource usage with a single-binary deployment that includes all the necessary Kubernetes components. This results in a smaller footprint compared to OpenYurt.
Edge computing focus: OpenYurt is explicitly built for edge computing scenarios, where resources are limited, network connectivity may be unreliable, and latency requirements are stringent. It provides features such as edge group and edge lattice to facilitate edge computing workloads. While k3s can also be used in edge environments, it does not offer as many specialized features for these use cases.
Management simplicity: k3s offers a simplified installation process and fewer moving parts, making it easier to set up and manage compared to OpenYurt. While OpenYurt is powerful in edge scenarios, this complexity may lead to a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with Kubernetes or edge computing concepts.
Community and ecosystem: k3s has gained significant traction in the Kubernetes community and has a robust ecosystem of tools and resources to support users. OpenYurt, being a more specialized project focused on edge computing, may have a smaller community and fewer third-party integrations available.

OpenYurt vs k3s

Overview