Portainer vs k3s

Overview

Portainer

Stacks506

Followers842

Votes146

k3s

Stacks97

Followers252

Votes16

Portainer vs k3s: What are the differences?

Portainer and k3s are two popular tools used in managing and orchestrating containers. While both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that make each tool unique and suitable for different use cases.

Architecture: Portainer is a container management platform that utilizes a centralized architecture. It requires a dedicated server to run the management interface and interact with the Docker engine. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution designed for resource-constrained environments. It uses a decentralized architecture where each node has control over its own resources.
Installation: Portainer offers a simple installation process and can easily be set up with a single Docker command. It doesn't require a deep knowledge of Kubernetes concepts. In contrast, k3s provides a lightweight installation process by bundling all the necessary Kubernetes components into a single binary. It simplifies the installation and reduces the resource footprint.
Resource usage: Portainer is a lightweight solution compared to traditional Kubernetes deployments, but it still requires resources to run as a separate container. It consumes CPU, memory, and storage for its operation. On the other hand, k3s is designed to be resource-efficient and has a minimal footprint. It consumes fewer system resources, making it more suitable for low-resource environments.
Feature set: Portainer provides a user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) for managing containers and containerized applications. It offers features like container deployment, scaling, monitoring, and access control. Conversely, k3s is a fully fledged Kubernetes distribution with a rich set of features for managing containerized applications at scale. It supports advanced functionalities such as networking, load balancing, storage management, and automatic scaling.
Scalability: Portainer is primarily designed for managing a single Docker engine, making it a suitable choice for small-scale deployments or single-node setups. On the other hand, k3s is designed to scale and supports managing multi-node Kubernetes clusters. It can handle large-scale deployments and distribute workloads across multiple nodes.
Ecosystem integration: Portainer integrates well with Docker and can provide a simplified user experience for managing Docker containers. It has built-in support for Docker Swarm mode, which allows managing container orchestration on multiple Docker hosts. K3s, on the other hand, is a fully compliant Kubernetes distribution and seamlessly integrates with the Kubernetes ecosystem. It supports deploying and managing applications using Kubernetes manifests and leveraging additional Kubernetes features and tools.

In summary, Portainer is a lightweight container management platform with a user-friendly interface, suitable for managing Docker containers in small-scale deployments. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution designed for resource-constrained environments and scalable Kubernetes deployments. It provides a full-fledged Kubernetes experience with minimal resource consumption.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer	k3s
It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.	Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation	ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support
Statistics
Stacks 506	Stacks 97
Followers 842	Followers 252
Votes 146	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Simple 27 Great UI 19 Friendly 12 Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker 11 Fully featured	Pros 6 Lightweight 4 Easy 2 Scale Services 2 Replication Controller 2 Open Source
Integrations
Docker Swarm Docker Secrets Auth0 Kubernetes Docker	Kubernetes SQLite

What are some alternatives to Portainer, k3s?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Docker Machine

Machine lets you create Docker hosts on your computer, on cloud providers, and inside your own data center. It creates servers, installs Docker on them, then configures the Docker client to talk to them.

Related Comparisons

Portainer vs k3s: What are the differences?

Architecture: Portainer is a container management platform that utilizes a centralized architecture. It requires a dedicated server to run the management interface and interact with the Docker engine. On the other hand, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution designed for resource-constrained environments. It uses a decentralized architecture where each node has control over its own resources.
Installation: Portainer offers a simple installation process and can easily be set up with a single Docker command. It doesn't require a deep knowledge of Kubernetes concepts. In contrast, k3s provides a lightweight installation process by bundling all the necessary Kubernetes components into a single binary. It simplifies the installation and reduces the resource footprint.
Resource usage: Portainer is a lightweight solution compared to traditional Kubernetes deployments, but it still requires resources to run as a separate container. It consumes CPU, memory, and storage for its operation. On the other hand, k3s is designed to be resource-efficient and has a minimal footprint. It consumes fewer system resources, making it more suitable for low-resource environments.
Feature set: Portainer provides a user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) for managing containers and containerized applications. It offers features like container deployment, scaling, monitoring, and access control. Conversely, k3s is a fully fledged Kubernetes distribution with a rich set of features for managing containerized applications at scale. It supports advanced functionalities such as networking, load balancing, storage management, and automatic scaling.
Scalability: Portainer is primarily designed for managing a single Docker engine, making it a suitable choice for small-scale deployments or single-node setups. On the other hand, k3s is designed to scale and supports managing multi-node Kubernetes clusters. It can handle large-scale deployments and distribute workloads across multiple nodes.
Ecosystem integration: Portainer integrates well with Docker and can provide a simplified user experience for managing Docker containers. It has built-in support for Docker Swarm mode, which allows managing container orchestration on multiple Docker hosts. K3s, on the other hand, is a fully compliant Kubernetes distribution and seamlessly integrates with the Kubernetes ecosystem. It supports deploying and managing applications using Kubernetes manifests and leveraging additional Kubernetes features and tools.

Portainer vs k3s

Overview