StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Rancher Fleet vs k3s

Rancher Fleet vs k3s

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

k3s
k3s
Stacks97
Followers252
Votes16
Rancher Fleet
Rancher Fleet
Stacks13
Followers72
Votes4
GitHub Stars1.6K
Forks248

Rancher Fleet vs k3s: What are the differences?

<Introduction: Rancher Fleet and k3s are two popular tools used in the Kubernetes ecosystem.

  1. Installation Complexity: Rancher Fleet is designed for managing multiple Kubernetes clusters, making it more suitable for larger-scale deployments. In contrast, k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution that is optimized for edge computing and single-node deployments, leading to a simpler installation process compared to Rancher Fleet.

  2. Resource Consumption: Rancher Fleet tends to consume more resources due to its extensive capabilities for managing multiple clusters and workloads. On the other hand, k3s is known for its efficient resource utilization, making it an ideal choice for resource-constrained environments or edge devices.

  3. Management Features: Rancher Fleet offers advanced management features such as centralized control and automated fleet management operations, providing more extensive control over multiple clusters. In contrast, k3s focuses more on lightweight deployment and minimal management overhead, making it easier to operate for smaller-scale deployments.

  4. Community Support: Rancher Fleet benefits from the support of the Rancher community, offering a wide range of resources, documentation, and community-driven contributions. While k3s also has a strong community backing, it is primarily focused on lightweight Kubernetes deployments, resulting in a more specialized community compared to Rancher Fleet.

  5. Scalability: Rancher Fleet is designed to scale and manage a large number of Kubernetes clusters efficiently, making it a preferred choice for enterprises with complex deployment requirements. On the other hand, k3s is more suitable for smaller-scale deployments or edge computing scenarios where scalability is not a primary concern.

  6. Integration Ecosystem: Rancher Fleet integrates seamlessly with other Rancher tools and platforms, providing a comprehensive solution for managing Kubernetes infrastructure. In contrast, k3s is more standalone in nature, offering simplified deployment without the extensive integration options available in Rancher Fleet.

In Summary, Rancher Fleet is more suited for larger-scale enterprise deployments with advanced management features and scalability, while k3s is ideal for lightweight deployments with minimal resource consumption and simplified management requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

k3s
k3s
Rancher Fleet
Rancher Fleet

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

It is a Kubernetes cluster fleet controller specifically designed to address the challenges of running thousands to millions of clusters across the world. While it's designed for massive scale the concepts still apply for even small deployments of less than 10 clusters. It is lightweight enough to run on the smallest of deployments too and even has merit in a single node cluster managing only itself.

ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support
Kubernetes cluster fleet controller; Designed for massive scale; Lightweight; Ensure that deployments are consistents across clusters
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
248
Stacks
97
Stacks
13
Followers
252
Followers
72
Votes
16
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Lightweight
  • 4
    Easy
  • 2
    Replication Controller
  • 2
    Scale Services
  • 2
    Open Source
Pros
  • 2
    UI Integration
  • 1
    Enterprise support
  • 1
    Scalability
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
SQLite
SQLite
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to k3s, Rancher Fleet?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana