RancherOS vs k3sup

Overview

RancherOS

Stacks104

Followers158

Votes3

GitHub Stars6.4K

Forks654

k3sup

Stacks7

Followers15

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.0K

Forks408

RancherOS vs k3sup: What are the differences?

Introduction

Key differences between RancherOS and k3sup are outlined below:

1. Architecture: RancherOS is a minimalist Linux distribution designed to run Docker containers, focusing on providing only the necessary components for containerized workloads. On the other hand, k3sup is a lightweight utility that simplifies the installation of Kubernetes clusters, particularly focusing on Kubernetes deployments.

2. Use Case: RancherOS is primarily suited for running containerized workloads due to its lightweight nature and minimalistic design. In contrast, k3sup is more oriented towards simplifying the deployment and management of Kubernetes clusters, making it ideal for users who require quick and streamlined Kubernetes setups.

3. Focus on containerization: RancherOS is designed to be container-centric, with the entire operating system running as Docker containers. In comparison, k3sup focuses on Kubernetes clusters, aiming to streamline the process of setting up and managing Kubernetes environments efficiently.

4. System Requirements: RancherOS has specific system requirements tailored for running container workloads efficiently, utilizing minimal resources for optimal performance. In contrast, k3sup has system requirements that align with Kubernetes specifications, ensuring that Kubernetes clusters are deployed and function correctly.

5. Community Support: RancherOS has an active community providing support and updates for the platform, making it easier for users to get assistance and stay updated on developments. On the other hand, k3sup benefits from the broader Kubernetes community, offering a wealth of resources and knowledge for users looking to deploy Kubernetes clusters using the utility.

6. Customization Options: RancherOS provides limited customization options due to its minimalistic design, focusing on simplicity and efficiency for container workloads. In contrast, k3sup offers more flexibility and customization when setting up Kubernetes clusters, allowing users to tailor their deployments according to specific requirements.

In Summary, the key differences between RancherOS and k3sup lie in their architecture, use cases, focus areas, system requirements, community support, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

RancherOS	k3sup
It makes it simple to run containers at scale in development, test and production. By containerizing system services and leveraging Docker for management, the operating system provides a very reliable and easy to manage containers.	It is a light-weight utility to get from zero to KUBECONFIG with k3s on any local or remote VM. All you need is ssh access and the k3sup binary to get kubectl access immediately. k3sup app install then provides several tillerless-helm charts out of the box.
Lightweight; Rancher Integration; Kuberenetes Integration;Minimalist OS;Comprehensive System Services;Improved Security	Open Source; Light-weight utility; Cross-compiled for Linux, Windows, MacOS and even on Raspberry Pi
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.4K	GitHub Stars 7.0K
GitHub Forks 654	GitHub Forks 408
Stacks 104	Stacks 7
Followers 158	Followers 15
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 System-docker	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Linux Docker Rancher Kubernetes	Kubernetes Linux Windows k3s Raspberry Pi Helm macOS

What are some alternatives to RancherOS, k3sup?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Related Comparisons