Load Impact vs k6

Overview

Load Impact

Stacks3

Followers9

Votes0

Stacks257

Followers226

Votes56

Load Impact vs k6: What are the differences?

1. Pricing: Load Impact offers a variety of pricing plans, including a free plan with limited features, and various paid plans with increasing levels of features and support. On the other hand, k6 has a different pricing model, with a limited free open-source version and a paid version with additional features and support. The specific pricing details for each tool may vary, so users should consider their needs and budget when choosing between the two.
2. Scripting Language: Load Impact primarily uses Lua as its scripting language, which provides a flexible and powerful way to create test scripts. On the other hand, k6 uses JavaScript as its scripting language, which is widely used and familiar to many developers. While both scripting languages can be used to create effective performance tests, the choice between Lua and JavaScript may depend on the user's familiarity and preference for a specific language.
3. Test Execution: Load Impact provides a cloud-based testing platform, where users can run their performance tests on Load Impact's infrastructure. This allows for easy scalability and distributed testing. On the other hand, k6 allows users to run tests either locally or in the cloud, giving more flexibility and control over where the tests are executed. This difference in test execution options can be important depending on the specific needs and constraints of the testing environment.
4. Reporting and Analysis: Load Impact provides comprehensive reporting and analysis capabilities, with detailed performance metrics, graphs, and charts. It also offers integrations with popular third-party tools for further analysis and visualization. k6, on the other hand, provides a more minimalistic reporting and analysis feature, focusing on providing essential information and metrics for performance testing. Users who require more advanced reporting and analysis may prefer Load Impact, while those who prefer a lightweight and simpler approach may opt for k6.
5. Integrations: Load Impact offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools and platforms, including CI/CD tools, version control systems, and monitoring tools. This allows for seamless integration of performance testing into the existing development and deployment workflows. k6 also provides some integrations but may have a more limited selection compared to Load Impact. Users should consider their specific tooling ecosystem and the desired level of integration when choosing between the two.
6. Support and Documentation: Load Impact provides extensive documentation and support resources, including guides, tutorials, and a dedicated support team. This ensures that users have access to the necessary resources for using the tool effectively and resolving any issues that may arise. k6 also provides documentation and community support, but the level of support may vary compared to Load Impact. Users who prioritize support and documentation may consider Load Impact as the preferred choice.

In Summary, Load Impact and k6 have key differences in terms of pricing, scripting language, test execution options, reporting and analysis capabilities, integrations, and support and documentation, allowing users to choose the tool that best fits their specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Load Impact, k6

Aravinth

SSE

Nov 19, 2019

Needs advice

I want to do performance testing with HTTP protocol but the test script should be java script. For now, I kept "Artillery" and "K6" tools in my queue. Did you guys have any idea about this? Is there any tools which support Test script language: JavaScript Protocol: Http/web service Must Feature: Record OS: Mac os/windows

84.4k views84.4k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Load Impact	k6
It is performance testing platform brings performance testing to the developer’s turf. Developers of all skill levels are able to easily pick up manual testing with it and simply transition to the more modern principles of DevOps and performance testing automation.	It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.
Server monitoring; Test scheduling and automation; Performance trending; Notifications; User scenario recorders; Realistic simulated users; Simultaneous multi-geo load generation; Automatic and advanced scripting; Command line interface; Parameterized data upload	Written in Go and JavaScript, built to integrate well into the modern developer workflow and automation pipelines; Primarily for load testing, it also works for functional testing of APIs and microservices with its powerful JS ES6 based scripting API; Straightforward CLI, sharing many UX aspects with the DevOps tools you already use
Statistics
Stacks 3	Stacks 257
Followers 9	Followers 226
Votes 0	Votes 56
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 13 Fits nicely in a CI workflow 11 Test scripts are written in javascript 11 Open-source 11 It's code-first 10 Easy to use Cons 3 Requires bundling and transpiling to use npm packages
Integrations
GitLab CircleCI Jenkins TeamCity Azure Pipelines	Kafka Linux Grafana InfluxDB macOS Datadog Debian Windows JSON

What are some alternatives to Load Impact, k6?

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

LoadNinja

It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.

Related Comparisons

Load Impact vs k6: What are the differences?

1. Pricing: Load Impact offers a variety of pricing plans, including a free plan with limited features, and various paid plans with increasing levels of features and support. On the other hand, k6 has a different pricing model, with a limited free open-source version and a paid version with additional features and support. The specific pricing details for each tool may vary, so users should consider their needs and budget when choosing between the two.
2. Scripting Language: Load Impact primarily uses Lua as its scripting language, which provides a flexible and powerful way to create test scripts. On the other hand, k6 uses JavaScript as its scripting language, which is widely used and familiar to many developers. While both scripting languages can be used to create effective performance tests, the choice between Lua and JavaScript may depend on the user's familiarity and preference for a specific language.
3. Test Execution: Load Impact provides a cloud-based testing platform, where users can run their performance tests on Load Impact's infrastructure. This allows for easy scalability and distributed testing. On the other hand, k6 allows users to run tests either locally or in the cloud, giving more flexibility and control over where the tests are executed. This difference in test execution options can be important depending on the specific needs and constraints of the testing environment.
4. Reporting and Analysis: Load Impact provides comprehensive reporting and analysis capabilities, with detailed performance metrics, graphs, and charts. It also offers integrations with popular third-party tools for further analysis and visualization. k6, on the other hand, provides a more minimalistic reporting and analysis feature, focusing on providing essential information and metrics for performance testing. Users who require more advanced reporting and analysis may prefer Load Impact, while those who prefer a lightweight and simpler approach may opt for k6.
5. Integrations: Load Impact offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools and platforms, including CI/CD tools, version control systems, and monitoring tools. This allows for seamless integration of performance testing into the existing development and deployment workflows. k6 also provides some integrations but may have a more limited selection compared to Load Impact. Users should consider their specific tooling ecosystem and the desired level of integration when choosing between the two.
6. Support and Documentation: Load Impact provides extensive documentation and support resources, including guides, tutorials, and a dedicated support team. This ensures that users have access to the necessary resources for using the tool effectively and resolving any issues that may arise. k6 also provides documentation and community support, but the level of support may vary compared to Load Impact. Users who prioritize support and documentation may consider Load Impact as the preferred choice.

Load Impact vs k6

Overview