StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. K9s vs Octant

K9s vs Octant

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

K9s
K9s
Stacks75
Followers103
Votes2
GitHub Stars31.7K
Forks2.0K
Octant
Octant
Stacks11
Followers45
Votes2

K9s vs Octant: What are the differences?

Key Differences between K9s and Octant

K9s and Octant are two popular Kubernetes management tools, each with its own unique features and capabilities. Below are the key differences between K9s and Octant:

  1. User Interface Design: K9s offers a terminal-based user interface that is primarily command-line driven. It provides a text-based representation of the Kubernetes resources and allows users to interact with them using keyboard shortcuts. On the other hand, Octant provides a web-based graphical user interface (GUI) that offers a more visual and intuitive approach to managing Kubernetes resources. It leverages modern web technologies to provide an interactive and dynamic experience for users.

  2. Resource Visualization: K9s focuses on providing a concise and compact visualization of Kubernetes resources in the terminal. It displays resource information in a tabular format with customizable columns and filters. It offers quick navigation and filtering options to efficiently explore the cluster's resources. In contrast, Octant offers a rich and comprehensive visualization of Kubernetes resources in the web interface. It provides detailed information about each resource, including the associated pods, logs, events, and configuration settings. Octant's visualizations help users understand the relationships and dependencies between resources more effectively.

  3. Extensibility and Plugin Support: K9s allows users to extend its functionality by creating custom plugins. This extensibility enables users to add additional features or integrate with external tools and services. Octant, on the other hand, offers a plugin system that allows users to extend its functionality by developing custom plugins. Octant's plugin system provides a well-defined interface for adding new views, workflows, or integrations within the Octant interface.

  4. Multi-Cluster Support: K9s supports managing multiple Kubernetes clusters from a single terminal session. It allows users to switch between clusters easily and view resources across different clusters simultaneously. Octant also supports managing multiple Kubernetes clusters but provides a more visual and intuitive approach to switch between clusters using its web-based interface.

  5. Access Control and RBAC: K9s is designed to run within the context of a user who has sufficient privileges to interact with the Kubernetes API server. It does not enforce any access control or role-based access control (RBAC) policies. Octant, on the other hand, enforces RBAC policies defined on the Kubernetes cluster. It ensures that users can only view and modify resources for which they have appropriate permissions based on their assigned roles and role bindings.

  6. Cross-Platform Support: K9s is a command-line tool that can be installed on a variety of operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows. It provides consistent functionality and user experience across different platforms. Octant, on the other hand, is a web-based tool that can be accessed using a web browser. It is platform-independent and can be used on any operating system with a compatible web browser.

In summary, K9s and Octant offer different approaches to Kubernetes management. K9s provides a terminal-based interface with compact visualization and extensive customization options, while Octant offers a web-based GUI with rich visualization and comprehensive resource information. Each tool has its own strengths and is suitable for different use cases based on user preferences and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

K9s
K9s
Octant
Octant

K9s provides a curses based terminal UI to interact with your Kubernetes clusters. The aim of this project is to make it easier to navigate, observe and manage your applications in the wild. K9s continually watches Kubernetes for changes and offers subsequent commands to interact with observed resources.

A tool for developers to understand how applications run on a Kubernetes cluster. It aims to be part of the developer's toolkit for gaining insight and approaching complexity found in Kubernetes.

-
Resource Viewer; Summary View; Port Forward; Log Stream; Label Filter; Cluster Navigation; Plugin System
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
75
Stacks
11
Followers
103
Followers
45
Votes
2
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Nice UI and fast way to manage my kubernetes clusters
Pros
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Web-based and on compatible with common OS
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
gRPC
gRPC
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to K9s, Octant?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana