1. Feature Set: Kakoune is a modal editor that emphasizes multiple selections and extensive keyboard shortcuts, whereas Monaco Editor is a more traditional code editor with basic features found in most text editors.
2. Community Support: Kakoune has a smaller community compared to Monaco Editor, resulting in fewer available plugins and a smaller user base for seeking support and collaboration.
3. Ease of Use: Monaco Editor is generally considered easier to use and more user-friendly compared to Kakoune, which may have a steeper learning curve due to its emphasis on modal editing and unique key bindings.
4. Code Completion: Monaco Editor offers robust code completion features, helping developers write code faster and with fewer errors, while Kakoune may require additional plugins or configurations to achieve similar functionality.
5. Integration: Kakoune is designed to be integrated seamlessly into terminal workflows, making it ideal for developers who prefer working in a terminal environment, whereas Monaco Editor is a standalone web-based editor that may not be as easily integrated into terminal-based workflows.
6. Customizability: Kakoune allows for deep customization and extensibility through its scripting capabilities, enabling users to tailor the editor to their specific needs, while Monaco Editor has more limited customization options out of the box.

In Summary, Kakoune and Monaco Editor differ in their feature set, community support, ease of use, code completion capabilities, integration options, and customizability.