Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Karma vs TestComplete: What are the differences?
Integration: Karma is primarily used for unit testing while TestComplete is focused on functional and automated testing of web, mobile, and desktop applications. While Karma integrates seamlessly with AngularJS projects, TestComplete offers a wider range of integration options with various platforms and technologies.
License: Karma is an open-source tool, providing its basic functionality for free. It offers flexibility for developers to customize and extend the tool according to their needs. In contrast, TestComplete is a commercial tool, which brings advanced features and technical support, but at a cost.
Supported languages and frameworks: Karma mainly supports JavaScript testing frameworks like Jasmine, Mocha, and QUnit. On the other hand, TestComplete supports a wider range of languages such as JavaScript, Python, VBScript, and more, making it versatile for different development environments.
User Interface: Karma is a command-line tool that runs tests in browsers specified by the user, without a graphical user interface. TestComplete, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly IDE with a rich set of features for creating, running, and analyzing test cases efficiently.
Cross-browser testing: TestComplete excels in cross-browser testing, providing a seamless approach to test applications across multiple browsers and versions. While Karma can be configured to run tests on various browsers, TestComplete offers more advanced features and capabilities for comprehensive cross-browser testing.
Community and support: Karma has a strong community support system, where developers can find a wealth of information, tutorials, and plugins to enhance their testing experience. TestComplete, being a commercial tool, offers dedicated technical support for its users, ensuring prompt assistance and guidance in test automation projects.
In Summary, Karma is ideal for unit testing and its integration with AngularJS projects, while TestComplete is a commercial tool with broader testing capabilities, cross-browser testing features, and dedicated technical support.
Pros of Karma
- Test Runner61
- Open source35
- Continuous Integration27
- Great for running tests22
- Test on Real Devices18
- Backed by google11
- Easy Debugging5
- Remote Control2
Pros of TestComplete
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Karma
- Slow, because tests are run in a real browser1
- Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically1









