Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Karma

2.6K
603
+ 1
181
TestComplete

37
60
+ 1
0
Add tool

Karma vs TestComplete: What are the differences?

  1. Integration: Karma is primarily used for unit testing while TestComplete is focused on functional and automated testing of web, mobile, and desktop applications. While Karma integrates seamlessly with AngularJS projects, TestComplete offers a wider range of integration options with various platforms and technologies.

  2. License: Karma is an open-source tool, providing its basic functionality for free. It offers flexibility for developers to customize and extend the tool according to their needs. In contrast, TestComplete is a commercial tool, which brings advanced features and technical support, but at a cost.

  3. Supported languages and frameworks: Karma mainly supports JavaScript testing frameworks like Jasmine, Mocha, and QUnit. On the other hand, TestComplete supports a wider range of languages such as JavaScript, Python, VBScript, and more, making it versatile for different development environments.

  4. User Interface: Karma is a command-line tool that runs tests in browsers specified by the user, without a graphical user interface. TestComplete, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly IDE with a rich set of features for creating, running, and analyzing test cases efficiently.

  5. Cross-browser testing: TestComplete excels in cross-browser testing, providing a seamless approach to test applications across multiple browsers and versions. While Karma can be configured to run tests on various browsers, TestComplete offers more advanced features and capabilities for comprehensive cross-browser testing.

  6. Community and support: Karma has a strong community support system, where developers can find a wealth of information, tutorials, and plugins to enhance their testing experience. TestComplete, being a commercial tool, offers dedicated technical support for its users, ensuring prompt assistance and guidance in test automation projects.

In Summary, Karma is ideal for unit testing and its integration with AngularJS projects, while TestComplete is a commercial tool with broader testing capabilities, cross-browser testing features, and dedicated technical support.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Karma
Pros of TestComplete
  • 61
    Test Runner
  • 35
    Open source
  • 27
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Great for running tests
  • 18
    Test on Real Devices
  • 11
    Backed by google
  • 5
    Easy Debugging
  • 2
    Remote Control
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Karma
    Cons of TestComplete
    • 1
      Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
    • 1
      Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Karma?

      Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

      What is TestComplete?

      It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Karma?
      What companies use TestComplete?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Karma?
      What tools integrate with TestComplete?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Karma and TestComplete?
      Jasmine
      Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
      Jest
      Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
      Mocha
      Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
      Protractor
      Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
      Git
      Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
      See all alternatives