StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Katalon Studio vs Playwright

Katalon Studio vs Playwright

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
Stacks152
Followers177
Votes0
Playwright
Playwright
Stacks618
Followers587
Votes81
GitHub Stars79.0K
Forks4.8K

Katalon Studio vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Introduction

Katalon Studio and Playwright are both popular frameworks used for automated testing of web applications. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two that make each unique. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Katalon Studio and Playwright.

  1. Support for Multiple Browsers: Katalon Studio offers built-in support for several web browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. On the other hand, Playwright provides support for almost all major web browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Playwright also supports multiple browser versions, making it more versatile for cross-browser testing.

  2. Programming Language: Katalon Studio primarily uses its own scripting language called Gherkin, which is based on the language used in Cucumber testing framework. Playwright, on the other hand, allows you to write test scripts using multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, and C#. This provides more flexibility for developers who are proficient in different programming languages.

  3. Test Execution: Katalon Studio offers both local and remote test execution capabilities. You can run tests on your local machine or leverage cloud-based testing infrastructure, such as Katalon TestOps, to execute tests remotely. Playwright also supports local test execution but does not have a built-in cloud-based execution environment. However, you can integrate Playwright with third-party tools like Testim or TestCafe to execute tests remotely.

  4. API and UI Testing: Katalon Studio focuses primarily on UI testing and provides a comprehensive set of built-in keywords and methods specifically designed for UI automation. It also supports API testing using RESTful Web Service keywords. Playwright, on the other hand, specializes in web automation and supports both UI and API testing. It offers a rich set of APIs for interacting with web elements and also provides features to handle network requests, intercept requests, and simulate various network conditions.

  5. Reporting and Analytics: Katalon Studio provides built-in reporting capabilities that allow you to generate detailed HTML reports with screenshots and logs. It also integrates with popular testing frameworks like JUnit and TestNG for reporting and analytics. Playwright, on the other hand, does not provide built-in reporting features. However, you can integrate it with third-party reporting tools like Allure or Mochawesome to generate detailed test reports.

  6. Community and Support: Katalon Studio has a large and active community of users, with extensive documentation and tutorials available. It also offers professional support services for enterprise customers. Playwright, although relatively new compared to Katalon Studio, has gained popularity among developers due to its powerful features and ease of use. It has an active community and provides support through GitHub issues.

In summary, Katalon Studio and Playwright differ in their browser support, programming language options, test execution capabilities, testing focus, reporting features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
Playwright
Playwright

Katalon Studio is a free and robust automation solution for API, Web and Mobile testing. It integrates all necessary components with built-in keywords and project templates into a complete automation framework. Katalon Studio is easy-to-use for new users but still offers advanced capabilities for experienced users. The solution is trusted by an active community of over 150K users from 150+ countries around the world.

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Productive IDE for API automation; API testing centric; Built to work with modern frameworks; Sustainable and scalable platform; Minimal maintenance; Built-in project templates; Generate tests automatically; Powerful test execution mechanism; CI/CD readiness; Dynamic failure handling and automatic re-execution; Report and Debug; Test Maintenance
Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
79.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
152
Stacks
618
Followers
177
Followers
587
Votes
0
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 15
    Cross browser
  • 11
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 7
    Promise based
Cons
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Travis CI
Travis CI
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
TestLink
TestLink
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Katalon Studio, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana