StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. KeystoneJS vs Netlify CMS

KeystoneJS vs Netlify CMS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS
Stacks69
Followers209
Votes27
Netlify CMS
Netlify CMS
Stacks523
Followers565
Votes6

KeystoneJS vs Netlify CMS: What are the differences?

Key Differences between KeystoneJS and Netlify CMS

Introduction

When comparing KeystoneJS and Netlify CMS, it is important to understand their key differences to determine which one suits your needs better. Both are content management systems (CMS) that allow users to easily manage and publish content on a website, but they differ in terms of functionality, customization options, and ease of use.

  1. Data Structure and Content Modeling: KeystoneJS provides a powerful and flexible data modeling system that allows developers to define their own data structures and relationships between content types. This enables complex data modeling and the ability to create custom fields or behaviors. On the other hand, Netlify CMS offers a simpler and more opinionated content modeling approach, where content types are defined using YAML configuration files. This makes it easier for non-technical users to set up and manage content without much customization.

  2. Hosting and Deployment: KeystoneJS is a self-hosted CMS, meaning you need to manage your own server infrastructure or choose a hosting provider to deploy your website. It requires more technical knowledge to set up and configure the server environment. On the contrary, Netlify CMS is fully hosted on the Netlify platform, providing a seamless hosting and deployment experience. You can connect your GitHub repository to Netlify and it automatically builds and deploys your website every time you push changes to your repository.

  3. Editorial Workflow and User Roles: KeystoneJS comes with built-in support for user roles and an editorial workflow. Developers can define different user roles and permissions, allowing fine-grained control over who can create, edit, publish, or delete content. Netlify CMS, on the other hand, offers a simpler editorial workflow with fewer options for user roles and permissions. It is more suitable for smaller teams or less complex content management needs.

  4. Customization and Extensibility: KeystoneJS is highly customizable and extensible, providing a large ecosystem of plugins and extensions. Developers have full control over the frontend and backend code, allowing them to customize the CMS to meet specific requirements. Netlify CMS, while offering some customization options through its API, has a more limited extensibility compared to KeystoneJS. It is more focused on simplicity and ease of use, sacrificing some advanced customization capabilities.

  5. User Interface and User Experience: KeystoneJS has a more complex user interface and requires some technical knowledge to navigate and manage content effectively. It has a steeper learning curve compared to Netlify CMS, which offers a simpler and more user-friendly interface. Netlify CMS aims to provide a smooth and intuitive user experience, making it easier for non-technical users to create and edit content.

  6. Community and Support: KeystoneJS has a larger and more established community compared to Netlify CMS. It has been around for a longer time, which means more resources, tutorials, and community support are available. Netlify CMS, although relatively newer, has a growing community and provides good documentation and support. However, if you prefer a CMS with a larger community and more established support channels, KeystoneJS might be a better choice.

In summary, KeystoneJS and Netlify CMS differ in terms of data modeling flexibility, hosting and deployment options, editorial workflow capabilities, customization and extensibility, user interface and user experience, as well as community support. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs of your project, considering factors such as technical expertise, content complexity, and desired level of customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS
Netlify CMS
Netlify CMS

Keystone is the easiest way to build database-driven websites, applications and APIs in Node.js.

It is built as a single-page React app. You can create custom-styled previews, UI widgets, and editor plugins or add backends to support different Git platform APIs.

Express.js and MongoDB;Dynamic Routes;Database Fields;Auto-generated Admin UI;Simpler Code;Form Processing;Session Management;Email Sending
Fast, web-based UI; platform agnostic; easy install; oaut2 and jwt; flexible content types; fully extensible
Statistics
Stacks
69
Stacks
523
Followers
209
Followers
565
Votes
27
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Out-of-box tools and basic services
  • 3
    Large community
  • 2
    Great schema-based auto-generated admin interface
  • 2
    Great sandbox to play with nodejs
  • 2
    Great CMS and API platform
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Free
  • 1
    GraphQL API
Cons
  • 2
    No relations between items
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
React
React
Gatsby
Gatsby

What are some alternatives to KeystoneJS, Netlify CMS?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack