KeystoneJS vs Symphony CMS

Overview

KeystoneJS

Stacks69

Followers209

Votes27

Symphony CMS

Stacks15

Followers24

Votes0

KeystoneJS vs Symphony CMS: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown code compares the key differences between KeystoneJS and Symphony CMS.

1. **Programming Language**: KeystoneJS is built using Node.js, which allows for real-time applications and JavaScript on both the client and server side. On the other hand, Symphony CMS is written in PHP, making it more suitable for traditional web applications.
   
2. **Community and Support**: KeystoneJS has a smaller community compared to Symphony CMS, resulting in fewer resources and plugins available for developers. Symphony CMS, being around for a longer time, has a larger community that offers extensive support and a wider range of features.

3. **Data Handling**: KeystoneJS relies on MongoDB for database handling, making it a good choice for projects requiring flexible schema and high-performance requirements. Symphony CMS, on the other hand, uses MySQL primarily for data storage, which provides more structured data handling.

4. **Flexibility and Extensibility**: KeystoneJS is highly extensible and flexible, allowing developers to customize and extend its features to meet specific project requirements easily. Symphony CMS, while also customizable, may require more effort for complex customizations due to its architecture.

5. **User Interface**: KeystoneJS provides an admin UI out of the box, making it easier for non-technical users to manage content. In contrast, Symphony CMS focuses more on developer-centric UI, which can be more challenging for non-technical users to navigate.

6. **Documentation**: Symphony CMS has extensive documentation covering various aspects of development, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues. KeystoneJS documentation, while improving, may not be as comprehensive as Symphony CMS.

In Summary, KeystoneJS and Symphony CMS differ in the programming language, community support, data handling, flexibility, user interface, and documentation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

KeystoneJS	Symphony CMS
Keystone is the easiest way to build database-driven websites, applications and APIs in Node.js.	It is a beautifully minimal PHP+MySQL-based open source content management system that uses XML and XSLT as its backbone. On the surface, it is similar in function to ExpressionEngine, Textpattern, WordPress, or Drupal.
Express.js and MongoDB;Dynamic Routes;Database Fields;Auto-generated Admin UI;Simpler Code;Form Processing;Session Management;Email Sending	Approaches content management with the underlying goals of simplicity and openness;Gives designers and developers complete control over data structures, URL schemas, and every bit of markup;Puts the Web's most exciting APIs at your fingertips with an easy-to-use, XML-centric data engine;Provides a lean, flexible core complemented by a rapidly growing extensions library
Statistics
Stacks 69	Stacks 15
Followers 209	Followers 24
Votes 27	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Out-of-box tools and basic services 3 Large community 2 Great CMS and API platform 2 Great schema-based auto-generated admin interface 2 Great sandbox to play with nodejs	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js MongoDB ExpressJS	LiteSpeed PHP MySQL Apache HTTP Server

What are some alternatives to KeystoneJS, Symphony CMS?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

KeystoneJS vs Symphony CMS: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown code compares the key differences between KeystoneJS and Symphony CMS.

1. **Programming Language**: KeystoneJS is built using Node.js, which allows for real-time applications and JavaScript on both the client and server side. On the other hand, Symphony CMS is written in PHP, making it more suitable for traditional web applications.
   
2. **Community and Support**: KeystoneJS has a smaller community compared to Symphony CMS, resulting in fewer resources and plugins available for developers. Symphony CMS, being around for a longer time, has a larger community that offers extensive support and a wider range of features.

3. **Data Handling**: KeystoneJS relies on MongoDB for database handling, making it a good choice for projects requiring flexible schema and high-performance requirements. Symphony CMS, on the other hand, uses MySQL primarily for data storage, which provides more structured data handling.

4. **Flexibility and Extensibility**: KeystoneJS is highly extensible and flexible, allowing developers to customize and extend its features to meet specific project requirements easily. Symphony CMS, while also customizable, may require more effort for complex customizations due to its architecture.

5. **User Interface**: KeystoneJS provides an admin UI out of the box, making it easier for non-technical users to manage content. In contrast, Symphony CMS focuses more on developer-centric UI, which can be more challenging for non-technical users to navigate.

6. **Documentation**: Symphony CMS has extensive documentation covering various aspects of development, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues. KeystoneJS documentation, while improving, may not be as comprehensive as Symphony CMS.

In Summary, KeystoneJS and Symphony CMS differ in the programming language, community support, data handling, flexibility, user interface, and documentation.

KeystoneJS vs Symphony CMS

Overview