StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Kind vs kubeadm-aws

Kind vs kubeadm-aws

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

kubeadm-aws
kubeadm-aws
Stacks2
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars861
Forks56
Kind
Kind
Stacks26
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.7K
Forks1.7K

Kind vs kubeadm-aws: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Kind and kubeadm-aws.

  1. Installation Process: Kind is a tool that runs Kubernetes clusters using Docker containers as nodes. It provides an easy way to create and manage multiple Kubernetes clusters locally. On the other hand, kubeadm-aws is a command-line tool specifically designed for provisioning and managing Kubernetes clusters on AWS (Amazon Web Services). It automates the process of setting up a Kubernetes cluster on AWS, including configuring the control plane and worker nodes.

  2. Supported Environments: Kind is primarily designed for local development and testing purposes. It is meant to be used on a developer's machine and provides a lightweight way to run multiple clusters simultaneously. Kubeadm-aws, on the other hand, is focused on deploying Kubernetes clusters in production environments on AWS. It takes into account AWS-specific configurations and integrates with services like Elastic Load Balancer, Auto Scaling Groups, and Elastic Block Store.

  3. Configuration Flexibility: Kind uses a declarative configuration file (in YAML format) to define the cluster and its nodes. This allows you to specify the number of nodes, their configurations, and other settings in a single file. Kubeadm-aws, on the other hand, uses a combination of command-line options and configuration files to define the cluster and its components. This provides more flexibility in terms of customizing the cluster's configuration based on specific requirements.

  4. Networking Options: Kind uses a simple network setup based on Docker's default networking (bridge network) for communication between nodes. This configuration is suitable for local development and testing scenarios. Kubeadm-aws, on the other hand, provides more advanced networking options for production deployments. It supports various networking plugins like Calico, Flannel, and Amazon VPC CNI, which allow for more efficient and scalable networking within the cluster.

  5. High Availability: Kind does not provide built-in support for high availability (HA) clusters. It is primarily focused on providing a lightweight and simplified Kubernetes environment for development and testing. Kubeadm-aws, on the other hand, supports the creation of highly available Kubernetes clusters using AWS-specific features like Auto Scaling Groups and Load Balancers. This ensures that the cluster is resilient and can handle failures without interruption.

  6. Cluster Upgrades: Kind does not have built-in support for automated cluster upgrades. If you want to upgrade your cluster to a newer Kubernetes version, you need to manually recreate the cluster using the updated version. Kubeadm-aws, on the other hand, provides a seamless upgrade process. It allows you to perform rolling upgrades of both the control plane and worker nodes, ensuring that the cluster is continuously available during the upgrade process.

In summary, Kind is a lightweight tool for running Kubernetes clusters locally, mainly for development and testing purposes, while kubeadm-aws is a tool specifically designed for provisioning and managing Kubernetes clusters on AWS, with features focused on production deployments, scalability, and high availability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

kubeadm-aws
kubeadm-aws
Kind
Kind

Bash and Terraform code which provisions affordable single master Kubernetes cluster on AWS. You can run a 1 master, 1 worker cluster for somewhere around $6 a month.

It is a tool for running local Kubernetes clusters using Docker container “nodes”. It was primarily designed for testing Kubernetes itself, but may be used for local development or CI.

Automatic backup and recovery; Automated provisioning; Variables; Auto Scaling of worker nodes; Persistent volumes
Supports multi-node (including HA) clusters; Supports building Kubernetes release builds from source; Support for make / bash / docker, or bazel, in addition to pre-published builds; Supports Linux, macOS and Windows; It is a CNCF certified conformant Kubernetes installer
Statistics
GitHub Stars
861
GitHub Stars
14.7K
GitHub Forks
56
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
2
Stacks
26
Followers
19
Followers
59
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Terraform
Terraform
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
NGINX
NGINX
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Bazel
Bazel

What are some alternatives to kubeadm-aws, Kind?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana