Kirby CMS vs SilverStripe

Overview

SilverStripe

Stacks182

Followers49

Votes7

Kirby CMS

Stacks36

Followers56

Votes21

Kirby CMS vs SilverStripe: What are the differences?

Implementation: Kirby CMS is file-based, which means that content is stored in plain text files, while SilverStripe is database-driven, storing content in a database. This impacts the scalability and performance of both platforms, with Kirby being more suitable for smaller websites and SilverStripe for larger, more complex projects.
Customization: Kirby relies heavily on custom fields and templates for customization, allowing for a lot of flexibility in design and functionality. SilverStripe, on the other hand, has a robust module system that enables extensive customization and the addition of new features without modifying core code.
User Interface: Kirby offers a minimalistic and intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate and manage content. SilverStripe, on the other hand, has a more complex admin panel with a steeper learning curve but provides more advanced features for content management.
Community Support: SilverStripe has a larger and more active community compared to Kirby, leading to more resources, plugins, and support available for users. This can be crucial for troubleshooting issues, getting assistance, and extending functionality.
Target Audience: Kirby CMS targets designers and developers looking for a lightweight, flexible, and fast solution, while SilverStripe is aimed at developers and organizations that require a robust, enterprise-level content management system with complex features and scalability.
Licensing: Kirby CMS requires a paid license for commercial use, while SilverStripe is free and open-source. This difference in licensing can influence the choice of platform based on budget constraints and project requirements.

In Summary, Kirby CMS and SilverStripe differ in their implementation, customization options, user interface, community support, target audience, and licensing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SilverStripe	Kirby CMS
It is the intuitive content management system and flexible framework loved by editors and developers alike. Equip your web teams to achieve outstanding results.	It is a file-based CMS, you can version control all content with Git or any other VCS. Deployments, backups and synchronization of multiple stages are a breeze. Multi-language support is baked right into the core, so you don’t depend on plugins or frameworks to translate your site.
Easy to learn; Optimised to produce highly reusable code; Powerful frontend template engine	High-performance PHP template engine; Powerful chainable PHP API; Drag & Drop installation via FTP
Statistics
Stacks 182	Stacks 36
Followers 49	Followers 56
Votes 7	Votes 21
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Easy to use 3 Extensible	Pros 5 Most flexible CMS 4 No database 4 Great, helpful community 3 Good documentation 3 Stunning support
Integrations
PHP Jest Travis CI PHPUnit Behat	Git PHP Vue.js

What are some alternatives to SilverStripe, Kirby CMS?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

Kirby CMS vs SilverStripe: What are the differences?

Implementation: Kirby CMS is file-based, which means that content is stored in plain text files, while SilverStripe is database-driven, storing content in a database. This impacts the scalability and performance of both platforms, with Kirby being more suitable for smaller websites and SilverStripe for larger, more complex projects.
Customization: Kirby relies heavily on custom fields and templates for customization, allowing for a lot of flexibility in design and functionality. SilverStripe, on the other hand, has a robust module system that enables extensive customization and the addition of new features without modifying core code.
User Interface: Kirby offers a minimalistic and intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate and manage content. SilverStripe, on the other hand, has a more complex admin panel with a steeper learning curve but provides more advanced features for content management.
Community Support: SilverStripe has a larger and more active community compared to Kirby, leading to more resources, plugins, and support available for users. This can be crucial for troubleshooting issues, getting assistance, and extending functionality.
Target Audience: Kirby CMS targets designers and developers looking for a lightweight, flexible, and fast solution, while SilverStripe is aimed at developers and organizations that require a robust, enterprise-level content management system with complex features and scalability.
Licensing: Kirby CMS requires a paid license for commercial use, while SilverStripe is free and open-source. This difference in licensing can influence the choice of platform based on budget constraints and project requirements.

In Summary, Kirby CMS and SilverStripe differ in their implementation, customization options, user interface, community support, target audience, and licensing.

Kirby CMS vs SilverStripe

Overview