Kitematic vs lazydocker

Overview

Kitematic

Stacks67

Followers116

Votes14

lazydocker

Stacks15

Followers44

Votes0

GitHub Stars47.3K

Forks1.5K

Kitematic vs lazydocker: What are the differences?

< Write Introduction here>

User Interface: Kitematic provides a graphical user interface (GUI) for managing Docker containers, making it easier for users who prefer visual tools. On the other hand, lazydocker is a terminal-based UI tool, catering to users who prefer command-line interfaces and want a more lightweight solution.
Resource Usage: Kitematic consumes more system resources due to its GUI elements and graphical rendering, which can impact performance on lower-end machines. In contrast, lazydocker is designed to be lightweight and efficient, requiring fewer resources and being more suitable for resource-constrained environments.
Features: Kitematic offers a wide range of features for managing Docker containers, including container creation, modification, and monitoring, as well as options for managing volumes and networks. Lazydocker focuses on providing essential management functions, such as viewing container logs, managing images, and monitoring container resource usage.
Customization: Kitematic allows for some customization of the GUI layout and features, but its options are limited compared to more advanced Docker management tools. Lazydocker, although terminal-based, offers more flexibility for customization through configuration files and command-line options, allowing users to tailor their experience to their specific needs.
Learning Curve: Kitematic is known for its user-friendly interface, which can reduce the learning curve for beginners or users unfamiliar with Docker terminology. Lazydocker, being command-line driven, may have a steeper learning curve for those not comfortable with terminal-based applications or Docker commands.
Community Support: Kitematic, being a part of the official Docker ecosystem, receives consistent updates and support from the Docker community, ensuring compatibility with the latest Docker features and versions. Lazydocker, while actively maintained by its developers, may not have the same level of community backing as an official Docker tool, potentially leading to slower updates and fewer resources for troubleshooting.

In Summary, Kitematic and lazydocker differ in their user interfaces, resource usage, feature sets, customization options, learning curves, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kitematic	lazydocker
Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X	It is a terminal UI for both docker and docker-compose, written in Go with the gocui library. It has all the information you need in one terminal window with every common command living one keypress away.
Mac App with GUI for Docker;Create images from any folder with a Dockerfile in it;Configure environment variables;Check App logs;Easily terminal into apps;Restart apps	viewing logs; viewing the state of your docker
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 47.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 67	Stacks 15
Followers 116	Followers 44
Votes 14	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 I like it because it sucks 3 No command line, Docker in one app, gui, easy to set up 2 Good for first timer 1 Easy to get started	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	Golang Docker Compose Docker

What are some alternatives to Kitematic, lazydocker?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Kitematic vs lazydocker: What are the differences?

< Write Introduction here>

User Interface: Kitematic provides a graphical user interface (GUI) for managing Docker containers, making it easier for users who prefer visual tools. On the other hand, lazydocker is a terminal-based UI tool, catering to users who prefer command-line interfaces and want a more lightweight solution.
Resource Usage: Kitematic consumes more system resources due to its GUI elements and graphical rendering, which can impact performance on lower-end machines. In contrast, lazydocker is designed to be lightweight and efficient, requiring fewer resources and being more suitable for resource-constrained environments.
Features: Kitematic offers a wide range of features for managing Docker containers, including container creation, modification, and monitoring, as well as options for managing volumes and networks. Lazydocker focuses on providing essential management functions, such as viewing container logs, managing images, and monitoring container resource usage.
Customization: Kitematic allows for some customization of the GUI layout and features, but its options are limited compared to more advanced Docker management tools. Lazydocker, although terminal-based, offers more flexibility for customization through configuration files and command-line options, allowing users to tailor their experience to their specific needs.
Learning Curve: Kitematic is known for its user-friendly interface, which can reduce the learning curve for beginners or users unfamiliar with Docker terminology. Lazydocker, being command-line driven, may have a steeper learning curve for those not comfortable with terminal-based applications or Docker commands.
Community Support: Kitematic, being a part of the official Docker ecosystem, receives consistent updates and support from the Docker community, ensuring compatibility with the latest Docker features and versions. Lazydocker, while actively maintained by its developers, may not have the same level of community backing as an official Docker tool, potentially leading to slower updates and fewer resources for troubleshooting.

In Summary, Kitematic and lazydocker differ in their user interfaces, resource usage, feature sets, customization options, learning curves, and community support.

Kitematic vs lazydocker

Overview