Kontena vs Pipedream: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will highlight the key differences between Kontena and Pipedream for users considering these platforms for their workflow automation and container management needs.

1. **Container Orchestration**: Kontena is focused on providing a container platform for organizations to manage their containers efficiently, offering features such as container orchestration, networking, and service discovery. In contrast, Pipedream is a workflow automation platform that enables users to connect APIs, trigger events, and build automations without the need for coding.

2. **Scalability and Extensibility**: Kontena offers a scalable solution for managing containers across multiple environments, providing flexibility and control over containerized applications. On the other hand, Pipedream offers extensibility through a wide range of pre-built integrations with popular services, allowing users to quickly set up automated workflows without extensive development efforts.

3. **Monitoring and Logging**: Kontena provides monitoring and logging capabilities to track container performance, gather insights, and troubleshoot issues effectively. In contrast, Pipedream offers event visualization and debugging tools to monitor workflow executions, identify bottlenecks, and optimize automation processes.

4. **Deployment Options**: Kontena supports on-premise, cloud-based, and hybrid deployments, giving organizations the flexibility to choose the infrastructure that best suits their needs. Pipedream is a cloud-native platform, designed to run entirely in the cloud, offering ease of use and quick setup for users looking for a serverless automation solution.

5. **Cost Structure**: Kontena offers pricing based on the number of nodes and containers managed, allowing organizations to scale their usage according to their requirements. Pipedream provides a free tier with limited features and usage limits, along with paid plans for users requiring advanced integrations and higher usage volumes.

6. **Community Support**: Kontena has an active community of users, contributors, and developers who provide support, resources, and documentation to help users get started and troubleshoot issues effectively. Pipedream also has a supportive community and dedicated customer success team to assist users with onboarding, best practices, and customization of workflows.

In Summary, the key differences between Kontena and Pipedream lie in their focus on container management and workflow automation, scalability options, monitoring capabilities, deployment choices, pricing models, and community support.