StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. KrakenD vs nginx

KrakenD vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9

KrakenD vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

KrakenD and nginx are both popular tools used for building and managing web applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between them that make each tool unique. Let's explore these differences in more detail:

  1. Architecture: KrakenD is designed as an API gateway, providing a unified interface for clients to access multiple back-end services. It acts as a proxy server, routing requests to the appropriate services. On the other hand, nginx is a general-purpose web server that is often used as a reverse proxy or load balancer. It can handle various protocols such as HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, and UDP, making it versatile for different use cases.

  2. Configuration: KrakenD uses a declarative configuration approach, where the desired state of the API gateway is described in a configuration file. This allows for easier version control and reproducibility of the configuration. In contrast, nginx uses a procedural configuration approach, where directives are written in a hierarchical structure within the configuration file. This provides more flexibility but may require more manual management and can be prone to human errors.

  3. Performance: KrakenD is built with a focus on high-performance and efficiency. It achieves this by leveraging a highly optimized runtime engine, utilizing caching mechanisms, and implementing a high-throughput request routing system. Nginx, on the other hand, also offers excellent performance but may require additional configuration and fine-tuning to achieve optimal results for specific use cases.

  4. Extensibility: KrakenD provides a plugin system that allows developers to extend its functionality and add custom features. This enables the integration of additional authentication methods, rate limiting, and other advanced capabilities. In comparison, nginx has a rich ecosystem of third-party modules and plugins, offering a wide range of extensions. These modules can enhance nginx's functionality, such as adding support for specific protocols, caching mechanisms, or security features.

  5. Ease of Use: KrakenD aims to provide a simplified and streamlined experience for developers. It abstracts away much of the complexities involved in building an API gateway, making it easier to configure and manage. Nginx, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve and may require more in-depth knowledge of its configuration directives and modules to effectively utilize its full potential.

  6. Community and Support: KrakenD has a growing community and support resources, but it may not have the same level of adoption and maturity as nginx. Nginx, being a widely-used web server and proxy, has a large and active user base. This translates to a wealth of online resources, documentation, tutorials, and community support that can be beneficial for developers seeking assistance or troubleshooting.

In summary, KrakenD and nginx have distinct characteristics that set them apart. KrakenD focuses on being an API gateway with a simpler configuration approach, high-performance, and extensibility through plugins. On the other hand, nginx is a versatile web server and proxy with a larger ecosystem of modules, but with more complexity and a steeper learning curve. Choosing between the two depends on the specific requirements, use case, and level of expertise of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, KrakenD

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
KrakenD
KrakenD

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

-
Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
59
Followers
61.9K
Followers
158
Votes
5.5K
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    Easiest to install
  • 1
    Easy to install
Integrations
No integrations available
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to NGINX, KrakenD?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase