StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. KubeAdvisor vs Portainer

KubeAdvisor vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portainer
Portainer
Stacks506
Followers842
Votes146
KubeAdvisor
KubeAdvisor
Stacks0
Followers3
Votes0

KubeAdvisor vs Portainer: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. License Model: KubeAdvisor is an open-source tool licensed under the Apache License 2.0, allowing users to modify and distribute the code freely. On the other hand, Portainer offers both open-source (community edition) and commercial (business edition) versions, providing different levels of features and support based on the edition chosen.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: KubeAdvisor primarily targets Kubernetes clusters and is designed to provide advisories and insights specifically for these environments. In contrast, Portainer supports various container orchestrators beyond Kubernetes such as Docker Swarm and Azure ACI, offering a more versatile solution for container management.

  3. Feature Set: KubeAdvisor focuses on providing recommendations and best practices for optimizing Kubernetes deployments, helping users enhance performance and efficiency based on industry standards. Portainer, in addition to container management capabilities, offers advanced features like role-based access control, monitoring, and deployment templates for easier containerized application deployments.

  4. Scalability: KubeAdvisor is tailored for scalability, allowing users to analyze and optimize large Kubernetes clusters effectively, ensuring performance and resource efficiency across the entire environment. Portainer, while suitable for small to medium-scale deployments, may face limitations in handling extensive or highly dynamic Kubernetes setups.

  5. User Interface: KubeAdvisor offers a clean and simple web interface focused on providing actionable insights and recommendations, making it user-friendly for administrators seeking to enhance their Kubernetes deployments. On the contrary, Portainer features a more comprehensive and visually appealing dashboard with customizable views and additional functionalities, catering to users who require detailed container management capabilities.

  6. Third-Party Integrations: KubeAdvisor has a limited scope in terms of third-party integrations, focusing mainly on Kubernetes-related tools and environments. Portainer, in comparison, offers a broader range of integrations with external services and tools, allowing users to connect and extend functionalities beyond container orchestration.

In Summary, KubeAdvisor and Portainer differ in terms of license model, deployment flexibility, feature set, scalability, user interface, and third-party integrations, catering to distinct user needs based on their container management requirements. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer
Portainer
KubeAdvisor
KubeAdvisor

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

It helps teams adopt best practices to accelerate the adoption of Kubernetes, and optimize their existing stack, with machine learning. It scans K8s to make infrastructure and cloud-native applications reliable, resilient, and observable.

Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Performance by continuously watching throttled containers/apps and recommending improvements; Utilization by comparing used resources with the available capacity to reallocate them based on variable workloads; Cost Optimization by suggesting changes at the VM level to save money in case of cloud infrastructure or identify the best configurations if you are running Kubernetes on-prem; Reliability by observing health probes, deployment configurations, Observability through a detailed analysis of the official cloud-native monitoring pipeline
Statistics
Stacks
506
Stacks
0
Followers
842
Followers
3
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Portainer, KubeAdvisor?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana