StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. LDAP vs ORY Kratos

LDAP vs ORY Kratos

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
Stacks14
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.5K
Forks1.1K
LDAP
LDAP
Stacks76
Followers70
Votes0

LDAP vs ORY Kratos: What are the differences?

Key Differences between LDAP and ORY Kratos

LDAP and ORY Kratos are two different technologies used for user management and authentication. While both can be used in websites, they have distinct differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: LDAP, which stands for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, is a protocol used for accessing and maintaining distributed directory information services. It is mainly used for centralized user management and authentication in enterprise environments. On the other hand, ORY Kratos is an open-source user management and authentication system specifically designed for modern web-based applications.

  2. Flexibility and Customization: LDAP is a highly flexible system that allows organizations to define their own directory structure and schema. It can be customized to fit specific needs and can support various authentication mechanisms. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, offers a streamlined approach to user management and authentication with predefined workflows and functionality. While it provides some level of customization, it may not offer the same level of flexibility as LDAP.

  3. Integration and Compatibility: LDAP is widely supported by different systems and applications, making it an excellent choice for integration with various services. It is compatible with different operating systems and can be easily integrated into existing infrastructures. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, is a standalone system that may require additional integration efforts with other services and systems.

  4. Ease of Use and Configuration: LDAP can have a steep learning curve, as it requires knowledge of the LDAP data model and directory schema design. It may require configuration and setup efforts to get it up and running. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, aims to provide a simpler and more user-friendly experience with easy configuration and setup. It offers a developer-friendly API and comes with a web interface for managing users and authentication settings.

  5. Scalability and Performance: LDAP is known for its scalability and performance, making it a suitable choice for large-scale directory services. It can handle high volumes of requests and can scale horizontally as the organization grows. ORY Kratos, being a web-based user management system, may have scalability limitations compared to LDAP. However, it is designed to be efficient and performant for typical web application scenarios.

  6. Community and Support: LDAP has been around for a long time and has a large community of users and developers. It benefits from a wide range of resources, documentation, and support from the community. ORY Kratos, being a relatively newer technology, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available. However, it is backed by the ORY community and offers commercial support options.

In summary, LDAP is a protocol used for centralized user management and authentication in enterprise environments, providing flexibility, compatibility, and scalability. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, is a modern user management and authentication system specifically designed for web applications, offering ease of use, streamlined workflows, and developer-friendly APIs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
LDAP
LDAP

It is a cloud native user management system. It provides user login and registration, multi-factor authentication, and user information storage with a headless API. It is fully configurable and supports a wide range of protocols such as Google Authenticator, and stores user information using JSON Schema.

It is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications.

Self-service Login and Registration; Multi-Factor Authentication; Account Verification; Account Recovery; Profile and Account Management
Lightweight directory access protocol; Used for authentication and storing information; General-purpose data store
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
14
Stacks
76
Followers
99
Followers
70
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to ORY Kratos, LDAP?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope