StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Lens vs oneinfra

Lens vs oneinfra

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lens
Lens
Stacks151
Followers183
Votes9
GitHub Stars23.0K
Forks1.5K
oneinfra
oneinfra
Stacks1
Followers9
Votes0
GitHub Stars877
Forks60

Lens vs oneinfra: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Lens and oneinfra, highlighting the key differences between them.

  1. User Interface: Lens is a Kubernetes IDE that provides a user-friendly interface for managing and interacting with Kubernetes clusters. It offers a comprehensive set of features like cluster management, workload deployment, and monitoring. On the other hand, oneinfra is a cloud infrastructure management platform that focuses on providing a centralized dashboard for managing multiple cloud platforms and resources. Its user interface is designed to allow users to easily manage and monitor their infrastructure across different cloud providers.

  2. Scope of Management: Lens primarily focuses on Kubernetes cluster management and provides advanced features specifically for Kubernetes. It offers enhanced functionalities for managing deployments, services, pods, and other Kubernetes resources. In contrast, oneinfra is a more comprehensive infrastructure management platform that supports multiple cloud providers and infrastructure services beyond Kubernetes. It allows users to manage resources like virtual machines, storage, databases, and more, across different cloud platforms.

  3. Multi-Cluster Support: Lens provides robust multi-cluster management capabilities, allowing users to manage multiple Kubernetes clusters from a single unified interface. It streamlines cluster discovery, configuration, and administration across different environments. Meanwhile, oneinfra also supports multi-cluster management but extends this capability to various cloud providers, enabling users to manage and monitor resources across multiple cloud platforms simultaneously.

  4. Monitoring and Analytics: Lens offers built-in monitoring and analytics features specifically tailored for Kubernetes clusters. It provides real-time metrics and insights into the cluster's performance, resource utilization, and health status. On the other hand, oneinfra integrates with various monitoring and analytics tools to provide a comprehensive view of the entire infrastructure, including Kubernetes clusters, virtual machines, and other resources deployed across different cloud providers.

  5. Extensibility and Customization: Lens allows users to extend its functionalities through plugins, enabling them to integrate additional tools and services into the IDE. Users can customize and enhance their workflows by adding custom plugins and extensions. Conversely, oneinfra focuses on providing a unified management platform with a predefined set of features and integrations. While it might not offer the same level of extensibility as Lens, it aims to simplify infrastructure management by providing a curated stack of functionalities.

  6. Open Source vs. Proprietary: Lens is an open-source project that offers a community-driven approach to Kubernetes management. It allows users to contribute to its development and benefit from continuous improvements based on community feedback and contributions. On the other hand, oneinfra is a proprietary platform that provides a commercial solution for managing cloud infrastructure. This distinction implies differences in licensing, support models, and community involvement.

In Summary, Lens is a Kubernetes IDE focused on cluster management with a rich feature set, while oneinfra is a comprehensive infrastructure management platform supporting multiple cloud providers, offering a centralized dashboard for resource management and monitoring.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Lens
Lens
oneinfra
oneinfra

It is the only IDE you’ll ever need to take control of your Kubernetes clusters. It is a standalone application for MacOS, Windows and Linux operating systems. It is open source and free.

It is a Kubernetes as a Service platform. It empowers you to provide or consume Kubernetes clusters at scale, on any platform or service provider. You decide.

Multi Cluster Management; Multiple Workspaces; Built-In Prometheus Stats; Built-in Helm Applications Management; Context Aware Terminal;
Kubernetes as a Service; Kubernetes clusters at scale; CLI tool that will allow you to test the reconciliation processes of oneinfra without the need of a Kubernetes cluster
Statistics
GitHub Stars
23.0K
GitHub Stars
877
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
60
Stacks
151
Stacks
1
Followers
183
Followers
9
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Keep track of cluster changes
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 2
    Easy management of multiple clusters
  • 1
    Local installation, not SaaS
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Lens, oneinfra?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana