Liquid vs Twig

Overview

Twig

Stacks382

Followers157

Votes8

Liquid

Stacks261

Followers126

Votes0

GitHub Stars11.5K

Forks1.5K

Liquid vs Twig: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown is a lightweight markup language that is commonly used for formatting text on the web. In this task, we will discuss the key differences between Liquid and Twig, two popular templating languages used in web development. We will format everything as Markdown code that can be used in a website.

Variable syntax: Liquid uses double curly braces ({{ }}) to denote variables, whereas Twig uses double curly braces ({{ }}) as well, but with an additional percent sign (%) to denote control structures. This means that Liquid and Twig have slightly different syntax for variables.
Control structure syntax: Liquid uses the {% %} syntax to define control structures like loops and conditionals, whereas Twig uses the {% %} syntax as well, but without the additional percent sign. This means that Liquid and Twig have slightly different syntax for defining control structures.
Built-in functions and filters: Liquid has a smaller set of built-in functions and filters compared to Twig. Twig provides a wider range of built-in functions and filters that can be used for tasks like string manipulation, date formatting, and more. This means that Twig offers more flexibility and functionality when it comes to manipulating and formatting data.
Template inheritance: Twig supports template inheritance, which allows you to create a base template and extend it in child templates, overriding specific blocks as needed. Liquid does not have built-in support for template inheritance, making it less flexible when it comes to structuring and reusing templates.
Custom filters and functions: Twig allows developers to create custom filters and functions, enabling them to extend the functionality of the templating engine based on their specific needs. Liquid, on the other hand, does not provide native support for creating custom filters and functions. This means that Twig offers more extensibility and customization options.
Syntax nuances: Liquid and Twig have some syntax nuances that differentiate them. For example, Twig uses the not keyword for negation, while Liquid uses the unless keyword. Additionally, Twig provides more advanced features such as macros and namespaces, which are not available in Liquid. These nuances in syntax and additional features contribute to the differences between Liquid and Twig.

In summary, Liquid and Twig differ in terms of variable and control structure syntax, available built-in functions and filters, template inheritance support, custom filter and function capabilities, and syntax nuances.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Twig, Liquid

Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET

Handlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Twig	Liquid
It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.	It is an open-source template language written in Ruby. It is the backbone of Shopify themes and is used to load dynamic content on storefronts. It is safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.
Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented	Render templates directly from the database;Smarty (PHP) style template engines;Template engine which does HTML just as well as emails;Allow your users to edit the appearance of your application but don't want them to run insecure code on your server
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 11.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 382	Stacks 261
Followers 157	Followers 126
Votes 8	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Native html, xml, txt etc 2 Gulp 2 Front to back with no efforts 2 For both nodejs and php	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP	VTEX Zendesk Voog Drip Ruby Jekyll Fedora Locomotive CMS

What are some alternatives to Twig, Liquid?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Liquid vs Twig: What are the differences?

Introduction

Variable syntax: Liquid uses double curly braces ({{ }}) to denote variables, whereas Twig uses double curly braces ({{ }}) as well, but with an additional percent sign (%) to denote control structures. This means that Liquid and Twig have slightly different syntax for variables.
Control structure syntax: Liquid uses the {% %} syntax to define control structures like loops and conditionals, whereas Twig uses the {% %} syntax as well, but without the additional percent sign. This means that Liquid and Twig have slightly different syntax for defining control structures.
Built-in functions and filters: Liquid has a smaller set of built-in functions and filters compared to Twig. Twig provides a wider range of built-in functions and filters that can be used for tasks like string manipulation, date formatting, and more. This means that Twig offers more flexibility and functionality when it comes to manipulating and formatting data.
Template inheritance: Twig supports template inheritance, which allows you to create a base template and extend it in child templates, overriding specific blocks as needed. Liquid does not have built-in support for template inheritance, making it less flexible when it comes to structuring and reusing templates.
Custom filters and functions: Twig allows developers to create custom filters and functions, enabling them to extend the functionality of the templating engine based on their specific needs. Liquid, on the other hand, does not provide native support for creating custom filters and functions. This means that Twig offers more extensibility and customization options.
Syntax nuances: Liquid and Twig have some syntax nuances that differentiate them. For example, Twig uses the not keyword for negation, while Liquid uses the unless keyword. Additionally, Twig provides more advanced features such as macros and namespaces, which are not available in Liquid. These nuances in syntax and additional features contribute to the differences between Liquid and Twig.

Liquid vs Twig

Overview

Liquid vs Twig: What are the differences?