StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Email Services
  4. Email Services
  5. Superhuman vs listmonk

Superhuman vs listmonk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Superhuman
Superhuman
Stacks60
Followers60
Votes0
listmonk
listmonk
Stacks9
Followers34
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks1.8K

Superhuman vs listmonk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Superhuman and listmonk

1. User Interface and Experience: Superhuman is known for its sleek and intuitive user interface. It offers a highly optimized and efficient workflow, with features like lightning-fast email search and a minimalist design. On the other hand, listmonk focuses on providing a simple and clean interface for managing mailing lists, focusing on bulk email delivery only.

2. Focus and Features: Superhuman is primarily designed as a premium email client, offering advanced features like read receipts, email tracking, and robust email organization capabilities. It aims to enhance productivity and efficiency for individual users. In contrast, listmonk is a self-hosted bulk email delivery system designed for businesses and developers who need a reliable and scalable solution to manage and send email newsletters or notifications.

3. Deployment and Control: Superhuman is a cloud-based service, meaning that users rely on Superhuman's servers and infrastructure for managing their emails. Users have limited control over the backend software and server configuration. In contrast, listmonk is a self-hosted solution, allowing businesses to have full control over their email infrastructure. It can be deployed on their own servers, providing flexibility, security, and data privacy.

4. Customization and Extensibility: Superhuman offers a polished user experience, but it has limited customization options. Users can only modify certain settings and preferences within the application. On the other hand, listmonk is highly customizable and provides extensive APIs, allowing developers to integrate it with their existing systems or build custom features on top of it. This flexibility provides developers with the ability to tailor the email service to their specific needs.

5. Pricing Model: Superhuman operates on a subscription-based pricing model, with a premium price tag for individual users. It offers a free trial but requires users to pay a monthly or annual fee to access their features. On the other hand, listmonk is an open-source software with a permissive license. It is free to use and can be self-hosted at no cost, making it an affordable option for businesses with limited budgets.

6. Support and Documentation: Superhuman provides dedicated customer support to its users, with a team available to help resolve any issues or answer questions. The company also offers comprehensive documentation and resources to assist users in getting started and making the most of the platform's features. In contrast, listmonk relies on community-driven support. While it has an active user community and online forums, it may not offer the same level of dedicated support as Superhuman.

In summary, Superhuman is a premium email client focusing on user experience and productivity, while listmonk is a self-hosted email delivery system suited for bulk mailing needs. Superhuman offers advanced features and a sleek interface, with limited customization options, while listmonk provides extensive customization and control options, with a focus on scalability and affordability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Superhuman
Superhuman
listmonk
listmonk

It is not just another email client. They are rebuilding the inbox from the ground up to make you brilliant at what you do. Specifically designed it for those of you who want the best.

It is a standalone, self-hosted, newsletter and mailing list manager. It is fast, feature-rich, and packed into a single binary. It uses a PostgreSQL database as its data store.

A.I. triage; Undo send; Insights from social networks; Follow-up reminders; Scheduled messages; Read statuses
self-hosted; newsletter manager; mailing list manager
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
60
Stacks
9
Followers
60
Followers
34
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Zoho Mail
Zoho Mail
Nicereply
Nicereply
Chatwork
Chatwork
Zapier
Zapier
Nimble
Nimble
GoToMeeting
GoToMeeting
Teamweek
Teamweek
Docker
Docker
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Superhuman, listmonk?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase