Locust vs Swagger UI

Overview

Locust

Stacks191

Followers317

Votes51

GitHub Stars27.0K

Forks3.1K

Swagger UI

Stacks2.1K

Followers1.8K

Votes207

GitHub Stars28.3K

Forks9.2K

Locust vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?

Execution Methodology: Locust is a performance testing tool that simulates user interactions and behavior by distributed load testing, whereas Swagger UI is an API documentation tool that helps visualize and interact with APIs.
User Interface: Locust provides a simple and minimalistic command-line user interface for running and monitoring tests, whereas Swagger UI offers a sleek web-based interface for exploring and testing APIs.
Primary Focus: Locust focuses on load testing and performance measurements of web applications, while Swagger UI concentrates on API documentation, design, and testing.
Scripting: In Locust, test scenarios are scripted using Python, allowing greater flexibility and customization, whereas Swagger UI primarily generates interactive documentation from OpenAPI Specifications.
Real-time Monitoring: Locust offers real-time live monitoring of performance metrics during the test execution, which is not a primary feature in Swagger UI.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: Locust is an open-source tool available for free, allowing for community contributions and customization, while Swagger UI is part of the larger Swagger ecosystem, offering additional paid features and integrations.

In Summary, Locust focuses on load testing web applications through distributed load testing methodologies, while Swagger UI is primarily an API documentation tool with a web-based interface for exploring and testing APIs, with Locust being open source and scriptable in Python, and Swagger UI belonging to the proprietary Swagger ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Locust, Swagger UI

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceon

Gatling

Locust

Flood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Locust	Swagger UI
Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.	Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API
Define user behaviour in code;Distributed & scalable;Proven & battle tested	The UI works in any development environment, be it locally or in the web;Allow end developers to effortlessly interact and try out every single operation your API exposes for easy consumption;Quickly find and work with resources and endpoints with neatly categorized documentation;Cater to every possible scenario with Swagger UI working in all major browsers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 27.0K	GitHub Stars 28.3K
GitHub Forks 3.1K	GitHub Forks 9.2K
Stacks 191	Stacks 2.1K
Followers 317	Followers 1.8K
Votes 51	Votes 207
Pros & Cons
Pros 15 Hackable 11 Supports distributed 7 Open source 6 Easy to setup 6 Easy to use Cons 1 Bad design	Pros 49 Open Source 34 Can execute api calls from the documentation 29 Free to use 19 Customizable 14 Easy to implement in .Net Cons 3 Need to learn YAML and RAML 2 Documentation doesn't look that good 1 Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages 1 Does not support hypermedia 1 You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting
Integrations
Python	Node.js Git Microsoft Edge Safari Firefox Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Locust, Swagger UI?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Read the Docs

It hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. You can import your docs using any major version control system, including Mercurial, Git, Subversion, and Bazaar.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

Gelato.io

Gelato.io is a SaaS tool for creating API documentation and developer portals.

MireDot

Generate REST documentation directly from your Java source code. This ensures always up-to-date and accurate documentation with minimal effort.

Related Comparisons

Locust vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?

Execution Methodology: Locust is a performance testing tool that simulates user interactions and behavior by distributed load testing, whereas Swagger UI is an API documentation tool that helps visualize and interact with APIs.
User Interface: Locust provides a simple and minimalistic command-line user interface for running and monitoring tests, whereas Swagger UI offers a sleek web-based interface for exploring and testing APIs.
Primary Focus: Locust focuses on load testing and performance measurements of web applications, while Swagger UI concentrates on API documentation, design, and testing.
Scripting: In Locust, test scenarios are scripted using Python, allowing greater flexibility and customization, whereas Swagger UI primarily generates interactive documentation from OpenAPI Specifications.
Real-time Monitoring: Locust offers real-time live monitoring of performance metrics during the test execution, which is not a primary feature in Swagger UI.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: Locust is an open-source tool available for free, allowing for community contributions and customization, while Swagger UI is part of the larger Swagger ecosystem, offering additional paid features and integrations.

Locust vs Swagger UI

Overview