Home
Application and Data
Data Stores
Databases

Lovefield vs VerneMQ

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Lovefield
2
27
+ 1
3
VerneMQ
31
136
+ 1
6
Add tool

Lovefield vs VerneMQ: What are the differences?

Developers describe Lovefield as "A relational database for web apps, by Google". Written in JavaScript, works cross-browser. Provides SQL-like APIs that are fast, safe, and easy to use. On the other hand, VerneMQ is detailed as "VerneMQ is a distributed IoT/MQTT message broker". VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications..

Lovefield belongs to "Databases" category of the tech stack, while VerneMQ can be primarily classified under "Message Queue".

Lovefield and VerneMQ are both open source tools. It seems that Lovefield with 6.11K GitHub stars and 383 forks on GitHub has more adoption than VerneMQ with 1.76K GitHub stars and 189 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Lovefield
Pros of VerneMQ
  • 2
    Relational database
  • 1
    No servers
  • 1
    Fully open source clustering
  • 1
    Proxy Protocol support
  • 1
    Open Source Plugin System
  • 1
    Open Source Message and Metadata Persistence
  • 1
    MQTT v5 implementation
  • 1
    Open source shared subscriptions

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Lovefield
Cons of VerneMQ
  • 1
    Limited memory store
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Lovefield?

    Written in JavaScript, works cross-browser. Provides SQL-like APIs that are fast, safe, and easy to use.

    What is VerneMQ?

    VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP. It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Lovefield?
    What companies use VerneMQ?
      No companies found
      See which teams inside your own company are using Lovefield or VerneMQ.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Lovefield?
      What tools integrate with VerneMQ?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Lovefield and VerneMQ?
        Pouchdb
        PouchDB enables applications to store data locally while offline, then synchronize it with CouchDB and compatible servers when the application is back online, keeping the user's data in sync no matter where they next login.
        AlaSQL
        Open source SQL database for Javascript with a strong focus on query speed and datasource flexibility for relational data, schemaless data, and graph data. Works in your browser, Node.js and Cordova. Handles both traditional relational tables and nested JSON data (NoSQL). Export, store, and import data from localStorage, IndexedDB, and Excel.
        MySQL
        The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
        PostgreSQL
        PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
        MongoDB
        MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
        See all alternatives

        Related Comparisons

        Lovefield vs PouchdbLovefield vs ZeroDBHeroic vs LovefieldIonDB vs LovefieldLovefield vs NuoDB

        Trending Comparisons

        Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

        Top Comparisons

        HipChat vs Mattermost vs SlackBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabBootstrap vs MaterializePostman vs Swagger UI