StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Lucene vs Redis

Lucene vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
Lucene
Lucene
Stacks175
Followers230
Votes2

Lucene vs Redis: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Lucene and Redis

Lucene and Redis are both popular technology solutions used in different scenarios. While Lucene is an open-source search library, Redis is an open-source in-memory data structure store. Their key differences can be summarized as follows:

  1. Data Storage and Retrieval: Lucene is primarily used for information retrieval from indexed text, allowing for efficient searching and ranking of documents. On the other hand, Redis is designed for general-purpose data storage and retrieval, supporting various data structures like strings, lists, sets, hashes, and more.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Lucene is built for handling large amounts of indexed text data and provides efficient search capabilities. It is well-suited for handling massive amounts of text-based data and searching within it. Redis, on the other hand, focuses on providing in-memory data storage and retrieval, offering exceptional performance for highly responsive applications with a lower volume of data.

  3. Data Persistence: Lucene does not provide built-in mechanisms for data persistence, as its primary focus is on searching and indexing. Data needs to be stored separately, such as in file systems or databases, and then used with Lucene for indexing and searching. Redis, on the other hand, provides data persistence options like snapshotting and replication, allowing data to be stored persistently and accessed even after system restarts or failures.

  4. Support for Transactions and Concurrency: Redis provides support for transactions, allowing atomic execution of multiple commands, and also supports concurrent access to data. It provides mechanisms like optimistic locking to handle concurrent modifications. Lucene, on the other hand, does not provide built-in support for transactions or concurrent modifications, as it is primarily focused on searching and indexing.

  5. Indexing and Querying Capabilities: Lucene offers powerful indexing and querying capabilities specifically designed for text-based data. It supports features like full-text search, ranking, field-level and fuzzy searching, and more. Redis, on the other hand, does not offer advanced indexing and querying capabilities out of the box. While it supports basic querying, it is not optimized for complex search scenarios.

  6. Data Structure Support: Lucene focuses on text-based data, offering various analyzers and filters for processing and indexing textual content. Redis, on the other hand, is a versatile data structure store, supporting a wide range of data types including strings, lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes, and more. It provides specific data manipulation operations for each data type for efficient storage and retrieval.

In summary, Lucene is well-suited for applications that require powerful full-text search capabilities and efficient indexing of text-based data. Redis, on the other hand, is a versatile in-memory data structure store that excels in providing fast response times and high performance for general-purpose data storage and retrieval.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
Lucene
Lucene

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Lucene Core, our flagship sub-project, provides Java-based indexing and search technology, as well as spellchecking, hit highlighting and advanced analysis/tokenization capabilities.

-
over 150GB/hour on modern hardware;small RAM requirements -- only 1MB heap;incremental indexing as fast as batch indexing;index size roughly 20-30% the size of text indexed;ranked searching -- best results returned first;many powerful query types: phrase queries, wildcard queries, proximity queries, range queries;fielded searching (e.g. title, author, contents);sorting by any field;multiple-index searching with merged results;allows simultaneous update and searching;flexible faceting, highlighting, joins and result grouping;fast, memory-efficient and typo-tolerant suggesters;pluggable ranking models, including the Vector Space Model and Okapi BM25;configurable storage engine (codecs)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
61.9K
Stacks
175
Followers
46.5K
Followers
230
Votes
3.9K
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 1
    Small
  • 1
    Fast
Integrations
No integrations available
Solr
Solr
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Redis, Lucene?

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

Sphinx

Sphinx

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase