StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Virtual Machine Platforms And Containers
  5. LXC vs Portainer

LXC vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LXC
LXC
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes19
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.2K
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

LXC vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Comparison between LXC and Portainer

LXC and Portainer are both tools used in the field of containerization, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features that set them apart. The key differences between LXC and Portainer are as follows:

  1. Container Technology: LXC (Linux Containers) is an operating system-level virtualization method that allows multiple isolated Linux systems, known as containers, to run on a single host. On the other hand, Portainer is a container management interface that provides a web-based graphical user interface (GUI) for Docker. While LXC focuses on the creation and management of Linux containers, Portainer offers a user-friendly interface specifically for managing Docker containers.

  2. User Interface: LXC primarily operates through command-line interfaces (CLI) and lacks a graphical user interface (GUI) by default. On the contrary, Portainer is designed to provide a visually appealing and intuitive GUI, making container management more accessible for users who prefer a graphical interface over command-line options.

  3. Features and Functionality: LXC, being an underlying containerization technology, provides the fundamental mechanisms to create and run containers. It offers low-level control over containers and allows users to customize the container environment extensively. In contrast, Portainer offers a wide range of management and deployment features specifically tailored for Docker containers. It simplifies the process of creating, managing, and monitoring containers while providing extra features like container templates, resource allocation, and access control.

  4. Ease of Use: LXC, being a CLI-driven tool, requires users to have a good understanding of command-line operations and Linux system administration. Beginners without much technical expertise may find it challenging to work with LXC directly. Portainer, with its user-friendly GUI, brings container management to a wider audience, including users with little or no prior experience with Docker or containers. It provides an intuitive interface that simplifies container operations, making it more accessible for users at various skill levels.

  5. Scalability: LXC is designed to offer high performance and efficiency in running Linux containers on a single host. It focuses on lightweight virtualization and can efficiently run multiple containers on a single operating system instance. Portainer, on the other hand, enables easy management of containers across multiple hosts, making it suitable for more complex deployments where containers are distributed across a cluster or multiple physical machines.

  6. Compatibility: LXC, being a native Linux containerization technology, is inherently compatible with all Linux distributions that support the necessary kernel features. It leverages the core functionalities of the host operating system, making it more streamlined and efficient in terms of resource allocation. Portainer, being a Docker management tool, is compatible with any operating system that supports Docker containers, such as Linux, Windows, and MacOS.

In summary, LXC is an operating system-level virtualization method specifically designed for running Linux containers, providing low-level control and customization. Portainer, on the other hand, is a user-friendly Docker management interface that simplifies container operations through its graphical user interface, making it accessible to users at various skill levels.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LXC
LXC
Portainer
Portainer

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

-
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
116
Stacks
507
Followers
223
Followers
842
Votes
19
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Simple and powerful
  • 3
    Good security
  • 2
    LGPL
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to LXC, Portainer?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana