Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Magnum CI vs Test Kitchen: What are the differences?
Developers describe Magnum CI as "Hosted Continuous Integration and Delivery Platform for private repositories". Magnum CI is a hosted continuous integration service for private projects. It supports multiple languages and tools to run test suite Service supports all major version control software and integrates with most popular code hosting platforms. There are no restrictions or limitations on where you store your source code, so even your own self-hosted repository will work right away.. On the other hand, Test Kitchen is detailed as "Integration tool for developing and testing infrastructure code and software on isolated target platforms". Test Kitchen has a static, declarative configuration in a .kitchen.yml file at the root of your project. It is designed to execute isolated code run in pristine environments ensuring that no prior state exists. A plugin architecture gives you the freedom to run your code on any cloud, virtualization, or bare metal resources and allows you to write acceptance criteria in whatever framework you desire.
Magnum CI and Test Kitchen can be primarily classified as "Continuous Integration" tools.
"Free" is the primary reason why developers consider Magnum CI over the competitors, whereas "Automated testing" was stated as the key factor in picking Test Kitchen.
Test Kitchen is an open source tool with 1.62K GitHub stars and 543 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Test Kitchen's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Magnum CI
- Free6
- Easy setup4
- Github integration3
- Gitlab integration2
- Slack integration1
- Bitbucket integration1
Pros of Test Kitchen
- Automated testing6
- Detect bugs in cook books4
- Integrates well with vagrant2
- Can containerise tests in Docker2
- Integrates well with puppet1