StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Manjaro vs NixOS

Manjaro vs NixOS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NixOS
NixOS
Stacks112
Followers96
Votes12
Manjaro
Manjaro
Stacks154
Followers189
Votes35

Manjaro vs NixOS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Manjaro and NixOS, two popular operating systems. Both Manjaro and NixOS are Linux distributions known for their unique features and functionalities. Let's explore their differences in more detail.

  1. Installation Process: Manjaro provides a simple and user-friendly installation process. It offers a graphical installer that allows users to easily set up the operating system. On the other hand, NixOS has a more complex installation process. It utilizes a command-line interface and requires users to follow a set of instructions to install and configure the system. This makes Manjaro more accessible to beginners, while NixOS is preferred by more experienced users who value its flexibility and customizability.

  2. Package Management: Manjaro utilizes the Pacman package manager, which is known for its speed and efficiency in handling software packages. Pacman uses a binary package format and relies on a central software repository for package installation and updates. In contrast, NixOS employs the Nix package manager, which follows a purely functional and atomic approach to package management. Nix allows for reproducible package installation and provides powerful dependency management capabilities. Unlike Pacman, Nix supports both binary and source package formats. This makes NixOS a more suitable choice for users who prioritize reproducibility and package management customization.

  3. Rolling Release vs. Immutable Releases: Manjaro follows a rolling release model, which means that the system is continuously updated with the latest software versions and security patches. This allows users to benefit from the most recent software developments, but it may also introduce occasional stability issues. On the other hand, NixOS takes a different approach by offering immutable releases. Each NixOS release is a self-contained, reproducible entity that can be deployed on multiple machines. This approach ensures stability and predictability, making NixOS a reliable choice for production environments and systems that require strict version control.

  4. System Configuration: Manjaro utilizes traditional configuration files, making it easier for users to modify system settings and customize their environment. This flexibility allows for a more personalized user experience and fine-tuning of the system. In contrast, NixOS employs a declarative approach to system configuration. It uses the Nix language to describe the desired state of the system, which is then translated into an immutable configuration. This approach ensures that the system configuration is version-controlled and reproducible. NixOS users benefit from the ability to roll back changes and maintain a consistent system state.

  5. Community Support: Manjaro has a sizable and vibrant community that actively supports and contributes to the development of the distribution. It offers various community editions and forums where users can seek help, share knowledge, and engage in discussions. NixOS, although less popular, has a dedicated and passionate community. Due to its unique approach to package management and system configuration, NixOS users can rely on the active support of the community and specialized forums. The community provides valuable resources and assistance for users seeking a more customized and functional system setup.

  6. Ease of Use vs. Advanced Customizability: Manjaro emphasizes ease of use and aims to provide a user-friendly experience out of the box. Its intuitive interface, graphical installer, and comprehensive software availability make it accessible to a wide range of users. NixOS, on the other hand, prioritizes advanced customizability and configurability. While it may require a steeper learning curve for beginners, NixOS offers unparalleled control over system settings and allows users to create highly tailored environments. This makes NixOS an attractive choice for power users and those who value extensive customization options.

In summary, Manjaro offers a simple installation process, utilizes the Pacman package manager, follows a rolling release model, employs traditional configuration files, and has a large supportive community. NixOS, on the other hand, has a more complex installation process, uses the Nix package manager, provides immutable releases, employs a declarative approach to system configuration, and offers advanced customizability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NixOS, Manjaro

Gopi
Gopi

Jun 21, 2020

Decided

I liked manjaro a lot, the huge support it has and the variety of tools it provides is just awesome. But due to its parent platform being Arch Linux it has bleeding-edge technology and that meaning, we get updated 'daily', and if we keep updating the system daily, due to the bugs in the recent updates the system sometimes used to crash, this made the OS really unstable. However, one can avoid such crashes using periodical and careful system/package updates. I now use LinuxMint which is based on Ubuntu, and this OS is completely stable with reliable(mostly tested) updates. And, since this OS is backed up by UBUNTU the concerns/questions one can encounter while using the OS can be easily rectified using the UBUNTU community, which is pretty good. Though this is backed up on UBUNTU it most certainly does NOT include the proprietary stuff of UBUNTU, which is on the bright side of the OS. That's it! Happy Computing.

231k views231k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NixOS
NixOS
Manjaro
Manjaro

It is a Linux distribution with a unique approach to package and configuration management. Built on top of the Nix package manager, it is completely declarative, makes upgrading systems reliable, and has many other advantages.

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

DevOps-friendly; atomic upgrades and rollbacks
-
Statistics
Stacks
112
Stacks
154
Followers
96
Followers
189
Votes
12
Votes
35
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Atomic upgrades
  • 2
    Rollback for any changes
  • 2
    Multi-user package management
  • 2
    Reproducible environment
  • 2
    Declarative system configuration
Pros
  • 9
    Good for beginners
  • 8
    AUR is huge
  • 6
    Very stable
  • 5
    Friendly community
  • 3
    Pacman is very fast
Cons
  • 6
    Would you give your grandma linux?
  • 3
    Occasional freezes if wrongly configured
  • 2
    Not highly stable
  • 1
    High data requirement frequently
Integrations
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to NixOS, Manjaro?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase