Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design for Bootstrap vs Meteor: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Material Design for Bootstrap and Meteor are both popular frameworks used for web development, each with its own unique features and capabilities.
Integration with Angular vs. Reactive Programming: Material Design for Bootstrap offers seamless integration with Angular, making it a preferred choice for Angular developers. On the other hand, Meteor framework emphasizes reactive programming, allowing for automatic updates to the UI when data changes without the need for manual intervention.
Component Library vs. Full-Stack Development: Material Design for Bootstrap provides a rich component library with pre-built UI elements for faster development. In contrast, Meteor is a full-stack framework, offering features like real-time data synchronization and server-side rendering out of the box.
Customization and Theming: Material Design for Bootstrap allows for easy customization and theming using Sass variables. In contrast, Meteor offers limited theming options, focusing more on providing a cohesive development environment rather than extensive customization capabilities.
Mobile-first Approach vs. Real-time Communication: Material Design for Bootstrap follows a mobile-first approach, ensuring responsive designs for various screen sizes. Meteor, on the other hand, excels in real-time communication through its built-in live data updates and persistent connections between the server and clients.
Community and Ecosystem: Material Design for Bootstrap benefits from a large community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation and resources available. In comparison, Meteor has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on providing support and guidance for developers using the framework.
Scalability and Performance: Material Design for Bootstrap is known for its scalability and performance optimizations, ensuring fast loading times and smooth user experiences. Meteor, while capable of handling real-time data efficiently, may face challenges in scaling large applications due to its reliance on a single-threaded architecture.
In Summary, Material Design for Bootstrap and Meteor offer unique approaches to web development, with Material Design focusing on design and component libraries while Meteor excels in real-time communication and full-stack development capabilities.
This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...
Pros of Material Design for Bootstrap
- Bootstrap16
- Light weight6
- Awesome and simple to use6
- Modern Looks4
- Google Material Design4
- Responsive4
- Open Source3
- Great angular compatibility3
Pros of Meteor
- Real-time251
- Full stack, one language200
- Best app dev platform available today183
- Data synchronization155
- Javascript152
- Focus on your product not the plumbing118
- Hot code pushes107
- Open source106
- Live page updates102
- Latency compensation92
- Ultra-simple development environment39
- Smart Packages29
- Real time awesome29
- Great for beginners23
- Direct Cordova integration22
- Better than Rails16
- Less moving parts15
- It's just amazing13
- Blaze10
- Great community support8
- Plugins for everything8
- One command spits out android and ios ready apps.6
- It just works5
- 0 to Production in no time5
- Coding Speed4
- Easy deployment4
- Is Agile in development hybrid(mobile/web)4
- You can grok it in a day. No ng nonsense4
- Easy yet powerful2
- AngularJS Integration2
- One Code => 3 Platforms: Web, Android and IOS2
- Community2
- Easy Setup1
- Free1
- Nosql1
- Hookie friendly1
- High quality, very few bugs1
- Stack available on Codeanywhere1
- Real time1
- Friendly to use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design for Bootstrap
- Not free for premo stuff2
Cons of Meteor
- Does not scale well5
- Hard to debug issues on the server-side4
- Heavily CPU bound4
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Material Design for Bootstrap?
What is Meteor?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Meteor?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Material Design for Bootstrap?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+17