Alternatives to Meteor logo

Alternatives to Meteor

React, Angular 2, Node.js, Django, and ASP.NET are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Meteor.
1.8K
1.8K
+ 1
1.7K

What is Meteor and what are its top alternatives?

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.
Meteor is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.
Meteor is an open source tool with 43K GitHub stars and 5.2K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Meteor's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Meteor

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • Angular 2
    Angular 2

    It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • Django
    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • ASP.NET
    ASP.NET

    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications. ...

  • Laravel
    Laravel

    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching. ...

  • Android SDK
    Android SDK

    Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment. ...

  • Spring Boot
    Spring Boot

    Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration. ...

Meteor alternatives & related posts

React logo

React

138.7K
114K
3.9K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
138.7K
114K
+ 1
3.9K
PROS OF REACT
  • 787
    Components
  • 661
    Virtual dom
  • 570
    Performance
  • 497
    Simplicity
  • 440
    Composable
  • 178
    Data flow
  • 164
    Declarative
  • 125
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 115
    Reactive updates
  • 113
    Explicit app state
  • 42
    JSX
  • 26
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 20
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 19
    Easy to Use
  • 15
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 11
    Great perfomance
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 9
    Built by Facebook
  • 6
    Speed
  • 6
    TypeScript support
  • 5
    Easy to start
  • 5
    Cross-platform
  • 5
    Server Side Rendering
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 5
    Awesome
  • 5
    Hooks
  • 5
    Feels like the 90s
  • 4
    Scales super well
  • 4
    Functional
  • 4
    Server side views
  • 4
    Fancy third party tools
  • 4
    Excellent Documentation
  • 4
    Props
  • 4
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 3
    Rich ecosystem
  • 3
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 3
    Super easy
  • 3
    Simple
  • 3
    Has functional components
  • 3
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 3
    SSR
  • 3
    Fast evolving
  • 3
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 3
    Just the View of MVC
  • 3
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 3
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 3
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 3
    Start simple
  • 3
    Has arrow functions
  • 3
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 2
    Easy as Lego
  • 2
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 2
    Sharable
  • 2
    Fragments
  • 2
    Permissively-licensed
  • 1
    Image upload
  • 1
    Recharts
CONS OF REACT
  • 36
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 25
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 24
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 9
    JSX
  • 7
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 5
    One-way binding only
  • 2
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 2
    Bad Documentation
  • 1
    Paradigms change too fast

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 2.1M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 28 upvotes · 1.4M views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
Angular 2 logo

Angular 2

5.1K
4K
453
A platform for building mobile and desktop web applications
5.1K
4K
+ 1
453
PROS OF ANGULAR 2
  • 100
    It's a powerful framework
  • 49
    Straight-forward architecture
  • 42
    TypeScript
  • 41
    Great UI and Business Logic separation
  • 39
    Powerful, maintainable, fast
  • 37
    Amazing CLI
  • 31
    Great mvc
  • 24
    Powerfull Dependency Injection
  • 18
    Easy to build
  • 14
    Opinionated, batteries-included approach
  • 12
    All in one Framework
  • 9
    Schematics
  • 8
    Solid Standard Setup.
  • 7
    Structured
  • 7
    Performance
  • 4
    Complex
  • 4
    Only for single page applications
  • 3
    Builders
  • 2
    Ng upgrade
  • 2
    RxJS
CONS OF ANGULAR 2
  • 9
    Overcomplicated
  • 9
    Large overhead in file size and initialization time
  • 2
    Ugly code
  • 2
    CLI not open to other test and linting tools

related Angular 2 posts

When Redash was created 5 years ago we chose AngularJS as our frontend framework, but as AngularJS was replaced by Angular 2 we had to make a new choice. We decided that we won't migrate to Angular, but to either React or Vue.js. Eventually we decided to migrate to React for the following reasons:

  1. Many in our community are already using React internally and will be able to contribute.
  2. Using react2angular we can do the migration gradually over time instead of having to invest in a big rewrite while halting feature development.

So far the gradual strategy pays off and in the last 3 major releases we already shipped React code in the Angular.js application.

See more
Max Musing
Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 10 upvotes · 439.8K views

From my experience of the early startup world, a majority of companies these days use Node.js. Python and Go are the next biggest languages, but significantly smaller than Node.

However, if you're having trouble with the front end aspect of Django, using Node probably won't make that easier for you. You'll have a lot more options between front end frameworks (React, Vue.js, Angular 2) , but they'll definitely take more time to learn than Django's templating system.

Think about whether you want to focus on front end or back end for now, and make a decision from there.

See more
Node.js logo

Node.js

153.3K
129.4K
8.5K
A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
153.3K
129.4K
+ 1
8.5K
PROS OF NODE.JS
  • 1.4K
    Npm
  • 1.3K
    Javascript
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 1K
    High-performance
  • 801
    Open source
  • 485
    Great for apis
  • 475
    Asynchronous
  • 420
    Great community
  • 390
    Great for realtime apps
  • 295
    Great for command line utilities
  • 81
    Node Modules
  • 81
    Websockets
  • 68
    Uber Simple
  • 59
    Great modularity
  • 58
    Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
  • 42
    Easy to start
  • 35
    Great for Data Streaming
  • 32
    Realtime
  • 28
    Awesome
  • 25
    Non blocking IO
  • 18
    Can be used as a proxy
  • 17
    High performance, open source, scalable
  • 16
    Non-blocking and modular
  • 15
    Easy and Fun
  • 14
    Easy and powerful
  • 13
    Same lang as AngularJS
  • 13
    Future of BackEnd
  • 12
    Fullstack
  • 11
    Fast
  • 10
    Scalability
  • 10
    Cross platform
  • 9
    Simple
  • 8
    Mean Stack
  • 7
    Easy concurrency
  • 7
    Great for webapps
  • 6
    Fast, simple code and async
  • 6
    Typescript
  • 6
    Friendly
  • 6
    React
  • 5
    Fast development
  • 5
    Control everything
  • 5
    Great speed
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 5
    Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
  • 5
    Its amazingly fast and scalable
  • 4
    Isomorphic coolness
  • 4
    It's fast
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Not Python
  • 3
    Less boilerplate code
  • 3
    One language, end-to-end
  • 3
    Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
  • 3
    TypeScript Support
  • 3
    Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
  • 3
    Performant and fast prototyping
  • 3
    Great community
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 3
    Blazing fast
  • 2
    Lovely
  • 2
    Event Driven
  • 2
    Npm i ape-updating
  • 0
    Node
CONS OF NODE.JS
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 43
    New framework every day
  • 37
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 31
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 23
    Callback
  • 18
    Javascript
  • 11
    Dependency hell
  • 11
    Dependency based on GitHub
  • 10
    Low computational power
  • 7
    Very very Slow
  • 7
    Can block whole server easily
  • 6
    Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
  • 3
    Unneeded over complication
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 3
    Breaking updates
  • 2
    No standard approach
  • 1
    Bad transitive dependency management
  • 1
    Can't read server session

related Node.js posts

Nick Rockwell
SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 44 upvotes · 2.1M views

When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 41 upvotes · 5.3M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Django logo

Django

31.8K
28.6K
4K
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
31.8K
28.6K
+ 1
4K
PROS OF DJANGO
  • 648
    Rapid development
  • 477
    Open source
  • 410
    Great community
  • 363
    Easy to learn
  • 269
    Mvc
  • 220
    Beautiful code
  • 214
    Elegant
  • 197
    Free
  • 195
    Great packages
  • 183
    Great libraries
  • 72
    Restful
  • 70
    Comes with auth and crud admin panel
  • 70
    Powerful
  • 66
    Great documentation
  • 62
    Great for web
  • 49
    Python
  • 38
    Great orm
  • 36
    Great for api
  • 28
    All included
  • 24
    Fast
  • 23
    Web Apps
  • 20
    Used by top startups
  • 19
    Clean
  • 18
    Easy setup
  • 17
    Sexy
  • 14
    Convention over configuration
  • 13
    ORM
  • 12
    Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
  • 11
    The Django community
  • 9
    King of backend world
  • 8
    Great MVC and templating engine
  • 7
    Its elegant and practical
  • 7
    Batteries included
  • 7
    Full stack
  • 6
    Fast prototyping
  • 6
    Cross-Platform
  • 6
    Have not found anything that it can't do
  • 6
    Mvt
  • 5
    Easy to develop end to end AI Models
  • 5
    Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
  • 5
    Very quick to get something up and running
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Great peformance
  • 4
    Many libraries
  • 4
    Python community
  • 4
    Modular
  • 4
    Map
  • 4
    Easy to change database manager
  • 4
    Zero code burden to change databases
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Full-Text Search
  • 3
    Scaffold
  • 3
    Just the right level of abstraction
  • 1
    Node js
  • 1
    Scalable
  • 0
    Rails
  • 0
    Fastapi
CONS OF DJANGO
  • 25
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 21
    Underpowered ORM
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
  • 8
    Not nodejs
  • 7
    Admin
  • 7
    Configuration hell
  • 5
    Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
  • 3
    Bloated admin panel included
  • 3
    Python
  • 3
    Not typed
  • 2
    InEffective Multithreading
  • 2
    Overwhelming folder structure

related Django posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

See more

Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

See more
ASP.NET logo

ASP.NET

24.5K
9.1K
35
An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
24.5K
9.1K
+ 1
35
PROS OF ASP.NET
  • 19
    Great mvc
  • 11
    Easy to learn
  • 5
    C#
CONS OF ASP.NET
  • 1
    Entity framework is very slow
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers

related ASP.NET posts

Greg Neumann
Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 979K views

Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

See more

Hi. We are planning to develop web, desktop, and mobile app for procurement, logistics, and contracts. Procure to Pay and Source to pay, spend management, supplier management, catalog management. ( similar to SAP Ariba, gap.com, coupa.com, ivalua.com vroozi.com, procurify.com

We got stuck when deciding which technology stack is good for the future. We look forward to your kind guidance that will help us.

We want to integrate with multiple databases with seamless bidirectional integration. What APIs and middleware available are best to achieve this? SAP HANA, Oracle, MySQL, MongoDB...

ASP.NET / Node.js / Laravel. ......?

Please guide us

See more
Laravel logo

Laravel

23.7K
19.5K
3.7K
A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
23.7K
19.5K
+ 1
3.7K
PROS OF LARAVEL
  • 532
    Clean architecture
  • 380
    Growing community
  • 359
    Composer friendly
  • 329
    Open source
  • 310
    The only framework to consider for php
  • 212
    Mvc
  • 204
    Quickly develop
  • 162
    Dependency injection
  • 151
    Application architecture
  • 139
    Embraces good community packages
  • 68
    Write less, do more
  • 63
    Orm (eloquent)
  • 61
    Restful routing
  • 51
    Database migrations & seeds
  • 50
    Artisan scaffolding and migrations
  • 36
    Awesome
  • 36
    Great documentation
  • 27
    Awsome, Powerfull, Fast and Rapid
  • 26
    Build Apps faster, easier and better
  • 25
    Promotes elegant coding
  • 22
    JSON friendly
  • 22
    Modern PHP
  • 22
    Easy to learn, scalability
  • 22
    Eloquent ORM
  • 21
    Most easy for me
  • 21
    Blade Template
  • 20
    Test-Driven
  • 20
    Beautiful
  • 14
    Based on SOLID
  • 14
    Security
  • 12
    Easy to attach Middleware
  • 12
    Cool
  • 12
    Clean Documentation
  • 11
    Simple
  • 11
    Convention over Configuration
  • 10
    Easy Request Validatin
  • 9
    Easy to use
  • 9
    Fast
  • 9
    Simpler
  • 8
    Its just wow
  • 8
    Laravel + Cassandra = Killer Framework
  • 8
    Get going quickly straight out of the box. BYOKDM
  • 8
    Friendly API
  • 7
    Simplistic , easy and faster
  • 7
    Super easy and powerful
  • 7
    Less dependencies
  • 6
    Its beautiful to code in
  • 6
    Great customer support
  • 5
    Minimum system requirements
  • 5
    Laravel Mix
  • 5
    Php7
  • 5
    Speed
  • 5
    Easy
  • 5
    The only "cons" is wrong! No static method just Facades
  • 5
    Fast and Clarify framework
  • 5
    Active Record
  • 4
    Laragon
  • 4
    Composer
  • 4
    Easy views handling and great ORM
  • 4
    Eloquent
  • 3
    Laravel Nova
  • 3
    Intuitive usage
  • 3
    Ease of use
  • 3
    Cashier with Braintree and Stripe
  • 3
    Laravel Forge and Envoy
  • 3
    Laravel Horizon and Telescope
  • 3
    Laravel Passport
  • 3
    Laravel casher
  • 3
    Laravel Spark
  • 2
    Scout
  • 2
    Rapid development
  • 1
    Succint sintax
  • 1
    Deployment
CONS OF LARAVEL
  • 48
    PHP
  • 31
    Too many dependency
  • 22
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
  • 12
    Heavy
  • 8
    Bloated
  • 7
    Laravel
  • 6
    Confusing
  • 5
    Too underrated
  • 3
    Not fast with MongoDB
  • 1
    Difficult to learn
  • 1
    Not using SOLID principles

related Laravel posts

I need to build a web application plus android and IOS apps for an enterprise, like an e-commerce portal. It will have intensive use of MySQL to display thousands (40-50k) of live product information in an interactive table (searchable, filterable), live delivery tracking. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory. Here is the technology stack: Backend: Laravel 7 Frondend: Vue.js, React or AngularJS?

Need help deciding technology stack. Thanks.

See more
Antonio Sanchez

Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

See more
Android SDK logo

Android SDK

22.8K
17.7K
786
An SDK that provides you the API libraries and developer tools necessary to build, test, and debug apps...
22.8K
17.7K
+ 1
786
PROS OF ANDROID SDK
  • 285
    Android development
  • 154
    Necessary for android
  • 127
    Android studio
  • 85
    Mobile framework
  • 81
    Backed by google
  • 26
    Platform-tools
  • 21
    Eclipse + adt plugin
  • 4
    Powerful, simple, one stop environment
  • 2
    Больно
  • 2
    Free
CONS OF ANDROID SDK
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Android SDK posts

    Jesus Dario Rivera Rubio
    Telecomm Engineering at Netbeast · | 10 upvotes · 917K views

    We are using React Native in #SmartHome to share the business logic between Android and iOS team and approach users with a unique brand experience. The drawback is that we require lots of native Android SDK and Objective-C modules, so a good part of the invested time is there. The gain for a app that relies less on native communication, sensors and OS tools should be even higher.

    Also it helps us set different testing stages: we use Travis CI for the javascript (business logic), Bitrise to run build tests and @Detox for #end2end automated user tests.

    We use a microservices structure on top of Zeit's @now that read from firebase. We use JWT auth to authenticate requests among services and from users, following GitHub philosophy of using the same infrastructure than its API consumers. Firebase is used mainly as a key-value store between services and as a backup database for users. We also use its authentication mechanisms.

    You can be super locked-in if you also rely on it's analytics, but we use Amplitude for that, which offers us great insights. Intercom for communications with end-user and Mailjet for marketing.

    See more
    Sezgi Ulucam
    Developer Advocate at Hasura · | 7 upvotes · 775.3K views

    I've recently switched to using Expo for initializing and developing my React Native apps. Compared to React Native CLI, it's so much easier to get set up and going. Setting up and maintaining Android Studio, Android SDK, and virtual devices used to be such a headache. Thanks to Expo, I can now test my apps directly on my Android phone, just by installing the Expo app. I still use Xcode Simulator for iOS testing, since I don't have an iPhone, but that's easy anyway. The big win for me with Expo is ease of Android testing.

    The Expo SDK also provides convenient features like Facebook login, MapView, push notifications, and many others. https://docs.expo.io/versions/v31.0.0/sdk/

    See more
    Spring Boot logo

    Spring Boot

    20.9K
    18.8K
    993
    Create Spring-powered, production-grade applications and services with absolute minimum fuss
    20.9K
    18.8K
    + 1
    993
    PROS OF SPRING BOOT
    • 140
      Powerful and handy
    • 132
      Easy setup
    • 123
      Java
    • 90
      Spring
    • 85
      Fast
    • 46
      Extensible
    • 37
      Lots of "off the shelf" functionalities
    • 32
      Cloud Solid
    • 26
      Caches well
    • 24
      Many receipes around for obscure features
    • 24
      Productive
    • 23
      Modular
    • 23
      Integrations with most other Java frameworks
    • 22
      Spring ecosystem is great
    • 21
      Fast Performance With Microservices
    • 20
      Auto-configuration
    • 18
      Community
    • 17
      Easy setup, Community Support, Solid for ERP apps
    • 15
      One-stop shop
    • 14
      Cross-platform
    • 14
      Easy to parallelize
    • 13
      Powerful 3rd party libraries and frameworks
    • 13
      Easy setup, good for build erp systems, well documented
    • 12
      Easy setup, Git Integration
    • 5
      It's so easier to start a project on spring
    • 4
      Kotlin
    CONS OF SPRING BOOT
    • 23
      Heavy weight
    • 17
      Annotation ceremony
    • 12
      Java
    • 11
      Many config files needed
    • 5
      Reactive
    • 4
      Excellent tools for cloud hosting, since 5.x

    related Spring Boot posts

    Praveen Mooli
    Engineering Manager at Taylor and Francis · | 17 upvotes · 2.5M views

    We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.

    To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following: 1. #Microservices - Java with Spring Boot , Node.js with ExpressJS and Python with Flask 2. #Eventsourcingframework - Amazon Kinesis , Amazon Kinesis Firehose , Amazon SNS , Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda 3. #Data - Amazon RDS , Amazon DynamoDB , Amazon S3 , MongoDB Atlas

    To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular 2 with RxJS

    #Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless

    See more

    Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

    Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

    See more