StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Mattermost vs Telegram

Mattermost vs Telegram

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mattermost
Mattermost
Stacks480
Followers582
Votes302
Telegram
Telegram
Stacks748
Followers635
Votes51

Mattermost vs Telegram : What are the differences?

Introduction

Mattermost and Telegram are both popular communication platforms, but they have several key differences that set them apart. In this comparison, we will discuss the main differences between Mattermost and Telegram.

  1. Customizability: Mattermost offers a higher level of customizability compared to Telegram. It allows users to modify the user interface, create custom themes, and develop plugins to enhance the functionality. On the other hand, Telegram has limited customization options, with only a few built-in themes to choose from.

  2. Self-hosting: Mattermost provides the option for self-hosting, allowing organizations to host their own server infrastructure to ensure data privacy and security. Telegram, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform that hosts all user data on their servers, which may not be suitable for organizations with strict data privacy requirements.

  3. Group communication: While both platforms support group communication, Mattermost offers more advanced features for managing teams and collaboration. It provides features like team creation, channel management, and integrations with third-party tools, making it a more suitable choice for organizations that require efficient team collaboration.

  4. End-to-end encryption: Telegram is known for its strong end-to-end encryption, which ensures that user conversations are secure and cannot be accessed by third parties. Mattermost, on the other hand, does not provide end-to-end encryption by default and requires additional setup and configuration to achieve the same level of security.

  5. Platform availability: Telegram is available on multiple platforms including iOS, Android, Windows, Mac, and Linux, allowing users to seamlessly communicate across different devices. Mattermost, on the other hand, has more limited platform support, with mobile apps available for iOS and Android, and a web-based version for other platforms.

  6. Pricing: Mattermost offers a free and open-source version that provides basic communication features. However, it also offers a paid version with additional features and support options for organizations that require more advanced functionality. Telegram, on the other hand, is completely free to use and does not offer any paid plans or features.

In summary, Mattermost offers more customizability, self-hosting options, advanced team collaboration features, but lacks default end-to-end encryption and has more limited platform support compared to Telegram. Additionally, while Mattermost provides both free and paid options, Telegram is completely free to use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mattermost
Mattermost
Telegram
Telegram

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

All your team communication in one place, searchable and accessible anywhere; Slack-compatible, not Slack-limited. Imports Slack channels, users and themes. Offers Slack-compatible webhooks and integrations including Hubot, Jenkins, GitLab and others; Self-host ready with System Console and IT admin tools for managing dozens of team sites. Installs with Linux binary, plus Docker, Heroku, AWS, Azure and Cloud Foundry options
Simple; Fast; Secure; Expressive; Social
Statistics
Stacks
480
Stacks
748
Followers
582
Followers
635
Votes
302
Votes
51
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Open source
  • 41
    On-premise deployment
  • 26
    Free
  • 22
    Built using golang
  • 21
    Fast and easy to use
Cons
  • 2
    Many basic features are enterprise only
  • 2
    Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise
  • 2
    Less integrations and plugins than slack
  • 1
    Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB
  • 1
    Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
Pros
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 8
    Great bot API
  • 8
    Free
  • 8
    Unlimited history
  • 4
    Can hide phone number
Cons
  • 3
    Requires phone number
  • 3
    Notification customisation is limited
  • 2
    No video call
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Segment
Segment
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitLab
GitLab
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Hubot
Hubot
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Amazon SES
Amazon SES
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to Mattermost, Telegram ?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Let's Chat

Let's Chat

Let's Chat is a persistent messaging application that runs on Node.js and MongoDB. It's designed to be easily deployable and fits well with small, intimate teams. It's free (MIT licensed) and ships with killer features such as LDAP/Kerberos authentication, a REST-like API and XMPP support.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack