StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Apache Maven vs Mill

Apache Maven vs Mill

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K
Mill
Mill
Stacks3
Followers4
Votes0

Apache Maven vs Mill: What are the differences?

  1. Dependency Management: Apache Maven is a build automation tool known for its strong dependency management capabilities. It uses a declarative approach for managing dependencies through its Project Object Model (POM). On the other hand, Mill is a build tool that focuses on simplicity and speed. While it also supports dependency management, it uses a more flexible approach that allows developers to define dependencies using Scala code directly.
  2. Build Configuration: Maven relies on XML-based configuration for defining the build process. It uses a predefined set of lifecycle phases and plugins to perform various build tasks. Mill, on the other hand, uses a Scala-based configuration DSL. It provides a concise and expressive way to define build tasks and dependencies.
  3. Incremental Compilation: Maven does not have built-in support for incremental compilation. It typically recompiles the entire project even if only a small part of the code has changed. Mill, on the other hand, has built-in support for incremental compilation. It only recompiles the modified files, resulting in faster build times for larger projects.
  4. Language Support: Maven is primarily used for Java projects and has strong support for Java libraries and frameworks. It also supports other JVM languages like Groovy and Scala. Mill, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Scala projects. It provides seamless integration with Scala and its ecosystem, making it a preferred choice for Scala developers.
  5. Plugin Ecosystem: Maven has a large and mature plugin ecosystem, with thousands of plugins available for various build and deployment tasks. These plugins can be easily added to a Maven project using the POM configuration. Mill, on the other hand, has a relatively smaller plugin ecosystem. While it does have some plugins available, it may not have the same breadth as Maven.
  6. Concurrency: Maven uses a single-threaded approach for executing build tasks. This means that the build process is executed sequentially, one task at a time. Mill, on the other hand, supports concurrent execution of build tasks. This allows for faster and more efficient builds, especially in multi-module projects.

In Summary, Apache Maven and Mill have key differences in terms of dependency management, build configuration, incremental compilation, language support, plugin ecosystem, and concurrency.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Mill
Mill

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

It is your shiny new Java/Scala build tool. It aims for simplicity by re-using concepts you are already familiar with, borrowing ideas from modern tools like Bazel, to let you build your projects in a way that's simple, fast, and predictable.

Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
Simple;Fast;Modern;Works with scala
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.4K
Stacks
3
Followers
1.7K
Followers
4
Votes
414
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Java
Java
Scala
Scala
Windows
Windows
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Arch Linux
Arch Linux

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, Mill?

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana