StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. MemSQL vs VoltDB

MemSQL vs VoltDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MemSQL
MemSQL
Stacks86
Followers184
Votes44
VoltDB
VoltDB
Stacks18
Followers72
Votes18

MemSQL vs VoltDB: What are the differences?

1. Scalability: MemSQL boasts of horizontal as well as vertical scalability, making it suitable for varying workloads and data volumes. On the other hand, VoltDB primarily focuses on horizontal scalability, thereby excelling in scenarios requiring high transaction throughput with low-latency requirements.

2. Consistency Model: MemSQL follows a typical distributed database model with its use of synchronous replication, allowing for strong consistency guarantees. In contrast, VoltDB utilizes a partition-based architecture along with its single-threaded execution model to provide serializable isolation levels, ensuring strong consistency in distributed environments.

3. Query Optimization: MemSQL incorporates a cost-based query optimizer that enhances query performance by generating optimal execution plans. Meanwhile, VoltDB leverages stored procedures to mitigate network overhead and latency, offering improved performance for transactional workloads.

4. Data Storage: MemSQL can support a hybrid architecture with a combination of in-memory and disk-based storage for efficient data processing. On the contrary, VoltDB is an in-memory database system, ensuring high-speed data access and processing capabilities without the need for disk storage, ideal for real-time data processing requirements.

5. Architecture: MemSQL follows a traditional shared-nothing architecture, enabling efficient distribution of data and processing across nodes in a cluster. In contrast, VoltDB employs an in-memory, lock-free, distributed architecture that ensures linear scalability and fault tolerance without sacrificing performance, making it suitable for high-demand transactional applications.

6. Use Cases: MemSQL is well-suited for analytical workloads, complex queries, and real-time dashboarding due to its hybrid storage capabilities and robust query optimization features. Conversely, VoltDB is ideal for use cases that require high-speed, high-throughput transaction processing, such as financial services, gaming, telecommunications, and real-time analytics applications.

In Summary, MemSQL and VoltDB differ in scalability options, consistency models, query optimization techniques, data storage approaches, architectural designs, and targeted use cases, catering to distinct data processing needs and workload requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MemSQL
MemSQL
VoltDB
VoltDB

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

ANSI SQL Support;Fully-distributed Joins;Compiled Queries; ACID Compliance;In-Memory Tables;On-Disk Tables; Massively Parallel Execution;Lock Free Data Structures;JSON Support; High Availability; Online Backup and Restore;Online Replication
In-Memory Performance with On-Disk Durability;Transparent Scalability with Data Consistency;NewSQL – All the benefits of SQL with Unlimited Scalability;JSON Support for Agile Development;ACID Compliant Transactions;Export Data to OLAP Stores and Data Warehouses
Statistics
Stacks
86
Stacks
18
Followers
184
Followers
72
Votes
44
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Distributed
  • 5
    Realtime
  • 4
    JSON
  • 4
    Concurrent
  • 4
    Sql
Pros
  • 5
    SQL + Java
  • 4
    A brainchild of Michael Stonebraker
  • 4
    In-memory database
  • 3
    Very Fast
  • 2
    NewSQL
Integrations
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
MySQL
MySQL
QlikView
QlikView
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to MemSQL, VoltDB?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

BuntDB

BuntDB

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase