Microsoft Fast Design vs Quasar Framework

Overview

Quasar Framework

Stacks451

Followers771

Votes404

GitHub Stars26.9K

Forks3.7K

Microsoft Fast Design

Stacks4

Followers52

Votes0

GitHub Stars9.6K

Forks609

Microsoft Fast Design vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Microsoft Fast Design and Quasar Framework:

1. **Customization and Themes**: Microsoft Fast Design offers a more structured approach to theming and customization, while Quasar Framework provides a high level of flexibility and customization options through its theming system and various UI components.
   
2. **Component Library**: Microsoft Fast Design has a comprehensive set of pre-built components for building web applications, while Quasar Framework offers a wide range of ready-to-use components as well as the ability to create custom components easily.
   
3. **Performance Optimization**: Quasar Framework places a strong emphasis on performance optimization techniques and provides tools like tree-shaking and lazy loading to improve the speed and efficiency of applications, whereas Microsoft Fast Design focuses more on design consistency and ease of use.
   
4. **Integration with Vue.js**: Quasar Framework is specifically designed to work seamlessly with Vue.js and takes advantage of its features, such as Vuex for state management and Vue Router for routing, while Microsoft Fast Design can be integrated with any front-end framework but may require additional configuration.
   
5. **Documentation and Support**: Quasar Framework has extensive documentation and a strong community support system, making it easier for developers to learn and troubleshoot issues, whereas Microsoft Fast Design may have limited resources and community support available.
   
6. **Mobile Applications**: Quasar Framework offers a dedicated platform for building cross-platform mobile applications using Cordova or Capacitor, while Microsoft Fast Design primarily focuses on web application development and may not provide the same level of support for mobile applications.

In Summary, Fast Design and Quasar Framework differ in customization and themes, component library, performance optimization, integration with Vue.js, documentation and support, and support for mobile applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Quasar Framework	Microsoft Fast Design
Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.	It is a collection of JavaScript packages centered around web standards, designed to help you efficiently tackle some of the most common challenges in website and application design and development.
SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready	Unopinionated; UI development and style guide tools; Bring your design system
Statistics
GitHub Stars 26.9K	GitHub Stars 9.6K
GitHub Forks 3.7K	GitHub Forks 609
Stacks 451	Stacks 4
Followers 771	Followers 52
Votes 404	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 59 Excellent documentation 44 Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more 40 Lots of UI components 39 Extensive collection of components 33 Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome Cons 4 Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Linux Electron macOS Windows Vue.js Material Design	React Vue.js AngularJS ASP.NET Blazor Aurelia

What are some alternatives to Quasar Framework, Microsoft Fast Design?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Microsoft Fast Design vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Microsoft Fast Design and Quasar Framework:

1. **Customization and Themes**: Microsoft Fast Design offers a more structured approach to theming and customization, while Quasar Framework provides a high level of flexibility and customization options through its theming system and various UI components.
   
2. **Component Library**: Microsoft Fast Design has a comprehensive set of pre-built components for building web applications, while Quasar Framework offers a wide range of ready-to-use components as well as the ability to create custom components easily.
   
3. **Performance Optimization**: Quasar Framework places a strong emphasis on performance optimization techniques and provides tools like tree-shaking and lazy loading to improve the speed and efficiency of applications, whereas Microsoft Fast Design focuses more on design consistency and ease of use.
   
4. **Integration with Vue.js**: Quasar Framework is specifically designed to work seamlessly with Vue.js and takes advantage of its features, such as Vuex for state management and Vue Router for routing, while Microsoft Fast Design can be integrated with any front-end framework but may require additional configuration.
   
5. **Documentation and Support**: Quasar Framework has extensive documentation and a strong community support system, making it easier for developers to learn and troubleshoot issues, whereas Microsoft Fast Design may have limited resources and community support available.
   
6. **Mobile Applications**: Quasar Framework offers a dedicated platform for building cross-platform mobile applications using Cordova or Capacitor, while Microsoft Fast Design primarily focuses on web application development and may not provide the same level of support for mobile applications.

Microsoft Fast Design vs Quasar Framework

Overview